I think we need to move to the moons of Mars and learn how to control robots that are on the surface. It's not the impatient way of getting there, but Mars has been there a long time.
Buzz AldrinRead
Going to Mars would evolve humankind into a two-planet species.
Interpretation
Exploring Mars could lead humanity to become a species living on two different planets.
Buzz Aldrin's quote suggests that the endeavor of going to Mars represents a significant step in human evolution, where we can potentially inhabit another planet beyond Earth. This expansion into space is not just about exploration, but signifies our ability to adapt and thrive in new environments, thereby marking a monumental shift in the history of humankind.
In practice
In a speech about future space missions, one might quote Buzz Aldrin to highlight the importance of Mars exploration.
I think we need to move to the moons of Mars and learn how to control robots that are on the surface. It's not the impatient way of getting there, but Mars has been there a long time.
America can take man to the moon, and America can take men to Mars - and beyond.
A hybrid human-robot mission to investigate an asteroid affords a realistic opportunity to demonstrate new technological capabilities for future deep-space travel and to test spacecraft for long-duration spaceflight.
Landing in the ocean and waiting for the Navy to come alongside and haul you out of the drink is what space capsules require. And after the capsule is recovered, it would take weeks for the ship to return to port.
The biggest benefit of Apollo was the inspiration it gave to a growing generation to get into science and aerospace.
Unfortunately, kids are led to believe things are easier to achieve than they really are.
It was unthinkable not long ago that a biologist or paleontologist would be at the same conference as an astrophysicist. Now we have accumulated so much data in each of these branches of science as it relates to origins that we have learned that no one discipline can answer questions of origins alone.
A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.
My complaint is that there are more books and news articles than there are primary scientific papers. I am probably the biggest critic of the hypesters, because it's dangerous when fields get overhyped.
My ambition was to bring to bear on medicine a chemical approach. I did that by chemical manipulation of viruses and chemical ways of thinking in biomedical research.
To understand a science it is necessary to know its history.
The latest authors, like the most ancient, strove to subordinate the phenomena of nature to the laws of mathematics.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.