I think we need to move to the moons of Mars and learn how to control robots that are on the surface. It's not the impatient way of getting there, but Mars has been there a long time.
Buzz AldrinRead
Going to Mars would evolve humankind into a two-planet species.
Interpretation
Exploring Mars could lead humanity to become a species living on two different planets.
Buzz Aldrin's quote suggests that the endeavor of going to Mars represents a significant step in human evolution, where we can potentially inhabit another planet beyond Earth. This expansion into space is not just about exploration, but signifies our ability to adapt and thrive in new environments, thereby marking a monumental shift in the history of humankind.
In practice
In a speech about future space missions, one might quote Buzz Aldrin to highlight the importance of Mars exploration.
I think we need to move to the moons of Mars and learn how to control robots that are on the surface. It's not the impatient way of getting there, but Mars has been there a long time.
America can take man to the moon, and America can take men to Mars - and beyond.
A hybrid human-robot mission to investigate an asteroid affords a realistic opportunity to demonstrate new technological capabilities for future deep-space travel and to test spacecraft for long-duration spaceflight.
Landing in the ocean and waiting for the Navy to come alongside and haul you out of the drink is what space capsules require. And after the capsule is recovered, it would take weeks for the ship to return to port.
The biggest benefit of Apollo was the inspiration it gave to a growing generation to get into science and aerospace.
Unfortunately, kids are led to believe things are easier to achieve than they really are.
More stars in the north are seen not to set, while in the south certain stars are no longer seen to rise.
An alleged scientific discovery has no merit unless it can be explained to a barmaid.
Just because things get a little dingy at the subatomic level doesn't mean all bets are off.
The ideas which led to the Analytical Engine occurred in a manner wholly independent of any that were connected with the Difference Engine. These ideas are indeed, in their own intrinsic nature, independent of the latter engine and might equally have occurred had it never existed nor even been thought of at all.
In the history of physics, there have been three great revolutions in thought that first seemed absurd yet proved to be true. The first proposed that the earth, instead of being stationary, was moving around at a great and variable speed in a universe that is much bigger than it appears to our immediate perception. That proposal, I believe, was first made by Aristarchos two millenia ago ... Remarkably enough, the name Aristarchos in Greek means best beginning.
The slow rejection of the foreign skin grafts fascinated me. How could the host distinguish another person's skin from his own?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.