Winning the prize wasn't half as exciting as doing the work itself.
Maria Goeppert-MayerRead
Mathematics began to seem too much like puzzle solving. Physics is puzzle solving, too, but of puzzles created by nature, not by the mind of man.
Interpretation
Mathematics is seen as an artificial puzzle, while physics deals with natural puzzles.
Maria Goeppert-Mayer distinguishes between the fields of mathematics and physics by emphasizing that mathematics is often perceived as the solving of abstract puzzles created by human intellect, while physics involves solving puzzles devised by the natural world. This highlights the inherent difference in the nature of problems each discipline addresses, illustrating that while both require analytical thinking, the source of the puzzles differs significantly.
In practice
In a lecture on the differences between theoretical and applied sciences.
Winning the prize wasn't half as exciting as doing the work itself.
It was our use of probability theory as logic that has enabled us to do so easily what was impossible for those who thought of probability as a physical phenomenon associated with "randomness". Quite the opposite; we have thought of probability distributions as carriers of information.
One theory which can no longer be taken very seriously is that UFOs are interstellar spaceships.
It is a right, yes a duty, to search in cautious manner for the numbers, sizes, and weights, the norms for everything [God] has created. For He himself has let man take part in the knowledge of these things ... For these secrets are not of the kind whose research should be forbidden; rather they are set before our eyes like a mirror so that by examining them we observe to some extent the goodness and wisdom of the Creator.
The average ground temperature of the Earth is impossible to measure since most of the Earth is ocean...So this average ground temperature is a fiction.
Magnitude may be compared to the power output in kilowatts of a [radio] broadcasting station; local intensity, on the Mercalli or similar scale, is then comparable to the signal strength noted on a receiver at a given locality. Intensity, like signal strength, will generally fall off with distance from the source; it will also depend on local conditions at the point of observation, and to some extent on the conditions along the path from source to that point.
I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science....It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.