Life ceases to be so oppressive: we are free to give our own lives meaning and purpose, free to redeem our suffering by making something of it.
Walter KaufmannRead
It does not follow that the meaning must be given from above; that life and suffering must come neatly labeled; that nothing is worth while if the world is not governed by a purpose.
Interpretation
Life's meaning is not predetermined and often must be defined by individuals rather than by external designations.
This quote emphasizes the idea that individuals should not rely on external sources to dictate the meaning of their lives or their suffering. Instead, it suggests that life is intrinsic, complex, and often lacks a clear purpose; thus, each person must find their own significance and navigate the challenges of existence without expecting neatly packaged answers from the world.
In practice
In a graduation speech to inspire students to find their own path in life.
Life ceases to be so oppressive: we are free to give our own lives meaning and purpose, free to redeem our suffering by making something of it.
The only theism worthy of our respect believes in God not because of the way the world is made but in spite of that. The only theism that is no less profound than the Buddha's atheism is that represented in the Bible by Job and Jeremiah.
Success is no proof of virtue. In the case of a book, quick acclaim is presumptive evidence of a lack of substance and originality.
Man stands alone in the universe, responsible for his condition, likely to remain in a lowly state, but free to reach above the stars.
All law is situational law. The sovereign produces and guarantees the situation in its totality. He has the monopoly over this last decision.
In the United States there is more space where nobody is than where anybody is. This is what makes American what it is.
The press doesn't stop publishing, by the way, in a fascist escalation; it simply watches what it says. That too can be an incremental process, and the pace at which the free press polices itself depends on how journalists are targeted.
If I shall exist eternally, how shall I exist tomorrow?
In argument similes are like songs in love; they describe much, but prove nothing.
You take fantasies, which for thousands of years belonged to the religious realm - overcoming death or our merging with the universe - and you suddenly start talking about them in a more technical perspective as something that can be achieved, not after you die with the help of supernatural beings, but in this very life with the help of technology.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.