A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery.
Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Law Giver.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote suggests that the pursuit of science is rooted in the belief that the universe operates under consistent laws, which in turn implies a higher power or Law Giver.
C. S. Lewis argues that the advancement of scientific thought is not merely based on empirical observation, but is deeply intertwined with the philosophical belief in an underlying order or law that governs the natural world. This expectation of lawfulness is based on the belief in a divine creator, who establishes these laws, driving humanity to explore and understand the universe scientifically.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about the relationship between faith and science, one could quote Lewis to illustrate how science is often influenced by theological beliefs.
More from C. S. Lewis
All quotes βI enjoyed my breakfast this morning, and I think that was a good thing and do not think it was condemned by God. But I do not think myself a good man for enjoying it.
Aim at heaven and you will get earth thrown in. Aim at earth and you get neither.
Forgiving and being forgiven are two names for the same thing. The important thing is that a discord has been resolved.
I pray because I can't help myself. I pray because I'm helpless. It doesn't change God - it changes me.
The instrument through which you see God is your whole self. And if a man's self is not kept clean and bright, his glimpse of God will be blurred
Similar quotes
The upshot of all this is that we live in a universe whose age we can't quite compute, surrounded by stars whose distances we don't altogether know, filled with matter we can't identify, operating in conformance with physical laws whose properties we donβt truly understand.
I think the next century will be the century of complexity.
Perhaps... some day the precision of the data will be brought so far that the mathematician will be able to calculate at his desk the outcome of any chemical combination, in the same way, so to speak, as he calculates the motions of celestial bodies.
I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term of Natural Selection.
It takes sixty-five thousand errors before you are qualified to make a rocket.
This preservation of favourable variations and the destruction of injurious variations, I call Natural Selection, or the Survival of the Fittest. Variations neither useful nor injurious would not be affected by natural selection and would be left a fluctuating element.