To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable - human-induced CO2 - is not science. To try to predict the future based on just one variable (CO2) in extraordinarily complex natural systems is folly. Yet when astronomers have the temerity to show that climate is driven by solar activities rather than CO2 emissions, they are dismissed as dinosaurs undertaking the methods of old-fashioned science.
There is no problem with global warming. It stopped in 1998. The last two years of global cooling have erased nearly 30 years of temperature increase. - Ian Plimer
There is no problem with global warming. It stopped in 1998. The last two years of global cooling have erased nearly 30 years of temperature increase.
- Ian Plimer
The climate stubbornly refuses to co-operate with computer models and the writers of alarmist popular articles and books. - Ian Plimer
The climate stubbornly refuses to co-operate with computer models and the writers of alarmist popular articles and books.
The creationists have this creator who is evil, who is small-minded, who is malevolent, and who is not very bright and can't even get his science rig… - Ian Plimer
The creationists have this creator who is evil, who is small-minded, who is malevolent, and who is not very bright and can't even get his science rig…
Climate has always changed. It always has and always will. Sea level has always changed. Ice sheets come and go. Life always changes. Extinctions of … - Ian Plimer
Climate has always changed. It always has and always will. Sea level has always changed. Ice sheets come and go. Life always changes. Extinctions of …
To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable - human-induced CO2 - is not science. To try to predict t… - Ian Plimer
To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable - human-induced CO2 - is not science. To try to predict t…
Login to join the discussion
Login to join the discussion