How long have we got? We have to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide within a decade, or temperatures will warm by more than one degree... We don't have much time left.
James HansenRead
Modern science is fast-moving, and no laboratory can exist for long with a program based on old facilities. Innovation and renewal are required to keep a laboratory on the frontiers of science.
Interpretation
Innovation is essential for keeping scientific research relevant and effective.
Burton Richter emphasizes the importance of continual innovation and renewal in scientific laboratories. As scientific fields advance rapidly, relying on outdated methods and equipment can hinder progress. Thus, to thrive and remain at the forefront of research, labs must adopt new technologies and methodologies that reflect the latest developments in science.
In practice
This quote can be used during a science conference to emphasize the need for cutting-edge research.
How long have we got? We have to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide within a decade, or temperatures will warm by more than one degree... We don't have much time left.
I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term of Natural Selection.
Positive findings are around twice as likely to be published as negative findings. This is a cancer at the core of evidence-based medicine.
It is to them [fossils] alone that we owe the commencement of even a Theory of the Earth ... By them we are enabled to ascertain, with the utmost certainty, that our earth has not always been covered over by the same external crust, because we are thoroughly assured that the organized bodies to which these fossil remains belong must have lived upon the surface before they came to be buried, as they now are, at a great depth.
Simplification of modes of proof is not merely an indication of advance in our knowledge of a subject, but is also the surest guarantee of readiness for farther progress.
What attracted me to immunology was that the whole thing seemed to revolve around a very simple experiment: take two different antibody molecules and compare their primary sequences. The secret of antibody diversity would emerge from that. Fortunately at the time I was sufficiently ignorant of the subject not to realise how naive I was being.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.