Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
Janet YellenRead
Monetary policy ultimately must be conducted in a pragmatic manner that relies not on any particular indicator or model but, instead, reflects an ongoing assessment of a wide range of information in the context of our ever-evolving understanding of the economy.
Interpretation
Monetary policy should be flexible and based on a broad understanding of economic conditions rather than strict adherence to specific models.
Janet Yellen emphasizes the importance of a pragmatic approach to monetary policy, suggesting that it should not be rigidly tied to specific indicators or models. Instead, policy-makers should continuously evaluate a variety of economic information, adapting their strategies to the changing dynamics of the economy to achieve effective results.
In practice
In a speech about economic strategies, a speaker might say, 'As Janet Yellen noted, monetary policy must evolve with the economy.'
Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
We need to keep in mind the well-established fact that the full effects of monetary policy are felt only after long lags. This means that policy makers cannot wait until they have achieved their objectives to begin adjusting policy.
A clear lesson of history is that a 'sine qua non' for sustained economic recovery following a financial crisis is a thoroughgoing repair of the financial system.
Transparency concerning the Federal Reserve's conduct of monetary policy is desirable because better public understanding enhances the effectiveness of policy. More important, however, is that transparent communications reflect the Federal Reserve's commitment to accountability within our democratic system of government.
For decades, the pace of technological change in manufacturing has outstripped that in the economy as a whole. And, so, firms - manufacturing firms - have found it easier to continue producing by - with - reducing their workforces.
Inequality has risen to the point that it seems to me worthwhile for the U.S. to seriously consider taking the risk of making our economy more rewarding for more of the people.
A single currency entails a fixed interest rate, which means countries can't manage their own currency to suit their own needs. You need a variety of institutions to help nations for which the policies aren't well suited. Europe introduced the euro without providing those structures.
Landlords grow rich in their sleep without working, risking or economising
China's government has far more control over the country's economy than our government has over ours, and it is moving from export dependence to a model of growth driven by domestic demand. Any restriction on exports to the U.S. would simply accelerate a process already underway.
So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear that there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free-enterprise system.
The world needs banking but it does not need banks.
The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.