You don't drive an economy by consuming - the consumer is not the engine, the consumer is the caboose.
Peter SchiffRead
Printing money is merely taxation in another form. Rather than robbing citizens of their money, government robs their money of its purchasing power.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights how printing money can devalue currency and act like a form of tax on citizens.
Peter Schiff's quote emphasizes that when governments print money, they are effectively taking away the value of that money rather than directly taking it from citizens. This process diminishes the purchasing power of money, leading to inflation, which ultimately acts as a hidden tax on the public as they can buy less with the same amount of money.
Themes
InflationMoneyTaxationPurchasing PowerGovernment
In practice
Example use cases
This quote could be used during a discussion on economic policy and its impact on citizens.
More from Peter Schiff
All quotes βSimilar quotes
Competition is the most promising means to achieve and secure prosperity. It alone enables people in their role of consumer to gain from economic progress. It ensures that all advantages which result from higher productivity may eventually be enjoyed.
Ludwig ErhardRead
The modern corporation must manufacture not only goods but the desire for the goods it manufactures.
John Kenneth GalbraithRead
Since 1948 I have spent every single day thinking how the economic and political worlds have changed.
Alan GreenspanRead
The most powerful forces in economics are not numbers or facts. They are prejudices and preferences. No amount of evidence will ever change the degree to which many of the rich and powerful prefer themselves to be richer and more powerful and others poorer and weaker.
Nick HanauerRead
Soon we saw that money going to women brought much more benefit to the family than money going to the men. So we changed our policy and gave a high priority to women. As a result, now 96% of our four million borrowers in Grameen Bank are women.
Muhammad YunusRead
Thirty years ago, many economists argued that inflation was a kind of minor inconvenience and that the cost of reducing inflation was too high a price to pay. No one would make those arguments today.
Martin FeldsteinRead