A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.
Malcolm XRead
When you want a nation, that's called nationalism... Black nationalism. A revolutionary is a Black nationalist. He wants a nation.
Interpretation
Nationalism emphasizes the desire for self-determination and unity among a specific ethnic or cultural group, highlighting the revolutionary aspirations within that context.
Malcolm X highlights the concept of nationalism in relation to the African American struggle for identity and self-determination. He asserts that black nationalism is a revolutionary movement aiming for a separate nation where black individuals can hold power and pride in their heritage, distinguishing it from general notions of nationalism that may not encompass the struggles faced by marginalized communities.
In practice
In a speech about cultural pride and unity at a civil rights rally.
A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.
I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he's wrong, than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil.
So over you is the greatest enemy a man can have β and that is fear. I know some of you are afraid to listen to the truth β you have been raised on fear and lies. But I am going to preach to you the truth until you are free of that fear...
Usually when people are sad, they don't do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about a change.
Time is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. Truth is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. You don't need anything else.
Not long ago, an English writer telephoned me from London, asking questions. One was "What's your alma mater?" I told him, "Books." You will never catch me with a free fifteen minutes in which I'm not studying something I feel might be able to help the black man.
Arguments can always be found to turn desire into policy.
Democracy is the best chance for the best people.
People are tired of being kept from the dignity that allows them to make their own choices.
One of the statistics that always amazes me is the approval of the Chinese government, not elected, is over 80 percent. The approval of the U.S. government, fully elected, is 19 percent. Well, we elected these people and they didn't elect those people. Isn't it supposed to be different? Aren't we supposed to like the people that we elected?
Political nature abhors a vacuum, which is what often exists for a year or two in a party after it loses a presidential election.
There is too much disagreement for disagreement's sake. In a time of persistent challenges that still call into question our most sacred aspirations as a country, we cannot afford shallow callous divisiveness in our public debate.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.