At the simplest level, economics can better show us the consequences of our actions. Less simple are cases in which we don't have the knowledge to predict the full consequences. Global warming and climate change are examples.
Edmund PhelpsRead
A nation's economy is more than its markets, tastes, technologies and property rights.
Interpretation
A nation's economy encompasses more than just its markets and resources; it includes cultural and social elements that shape its functioning.
Edmund Phelps highlights that a nation's economy is not solely defined by its markets, consumer preferences, technological advancements, or legal structures regarding property. Instead, it encompasses a broader set of factors including social norms, cultural values, and the collective behavior of its citizens, which all contribute to how an economy operates and thrives.
In practice
In a discussion on economic policies, one might say, 'As Phelps reminds us, a nation's economy is shaped by more than just its markets.'
At the simplest level, economics can better show us the consequences of our actions. Less simple are cases in which we don't have the knowledge to predict the full consequences. Global warming and climate change are examples.
If every effect of any new products or methods were required to be known before they could be produced and marketed, they would not be true innovations - and thus not represent new knowledge of what people would like, if offered.
The good life, as it is popularly conceived, typically involves acquiring mastery in one's work, thus gaining for oneself better terms - or means to rewards, whether material, like wealth, or nonmaterial - an experience we may call 'prospering.'
The epic story of the West is the development in the 19th century of a mass prosperity the world had never seen and its near-disappearance in one nation after another in the 20th.
Entrepreneurs have only the murkiest picture of the future in which they are making their bets, and also there is ambiguity: they don't know when they push this lever or that lever that the outcome is going to be what they think it is going to be - there is the law of unanticipated consequences.
When the word 'morality' comes up in connection with economics, income distribution and financial stability are usually the issues. Is it moral for rich countries to use such a high proportion of the world's resources or for investment bankers to earn large bonuses?
Citigroup, Bank of America, and JP Morgan Chase should not be permitted to charge consumers 25- to 30-percent interest on their credit cards, especially while these banks received over $4 trillion in loans from the Federal Reserve.
Many markets work best with little or no outside interference. But others - especially those subject to big 'externalities' - need a helping hand.
The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.
I went to the bank and proposed that they lend money to the poor people. The bankers almost fell over.
Zoning laws making housing more expensive? That's less of a problem with a universal basic income and more of a reason to put money directly into people's hands.
Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while maintaining privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.