I am nothing but I must be everything.
Karl MarxRead
The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe.
Interpretation
This quote highlights the relentless drive of capitalism to seek new markets for its products globally.
Karl Marx's statement emphasizes the insatiable need of capitalist enterprises to continuously find and exploit new markets. This pursuit leads the bourgeoisie—capitalist class—to search far and wide, transforming economic behavior and relationships across the globe, while also highlighting the inherent dynamics and consequences of capitalism in its quest for profit.
In practice
In a lecture on economic theories, I quoted Marx to illustrate how fundamental capitalist dynamics shape global trade.
I am nothing but I must be everything.
Religion is the opiate of the people.
It is absolutely impossible to transcend the laws of nature. What can change in historically different circumstances is only the form in which these laws expose themselves.
Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.
To be radical is to grasp things by the root.
Men's ideas are the most direct emanations of their material state.
There's a long list of investments that governments could and should be making. There is strengthening infrastructure, such as transport and communications; there is investment in education; there is investment in families, particularly putting measures in place that free women from having to make the choice between raising a family and work.
The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income as defined by the GDP.
The value of a thing is the amount of laboring or work that its possession will save the possessor.
Thus, the weight of my criticism is directed against the inadequacy of the theoretical foundations of the laissez-faire doctrine upon which I was brought up and for many years I taught
When the word 'morality' comes up in connection with economics, income distribution and financial stability are usually the issues. Is it moral for rich countries to use such a high proportion of the world's resources or for investment bankers to earn large bonuses?
What I did not know yet about hunger, but would find out over the next twenty-one years, was that brilliant theorists of economics do not find it worthwhile to spend time discussing issues of poverty and hunger. They believe that these will be resolved when general economic prosperity increases. These economists spend all their talents detailing the process of development and prosperity, but rarely reflect on the origin and development of poverty and hunger. A a result, poverty continues.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.