Man is the only creature disposed to kill huge numbers of members of his own species, and his instrument is usually the state.
Joseph SobranRead
There has never been a humane communist regime. Marxism is inherently totalitarian. It recognizes no moral limits on the state. It’s the most convenient ideology for aspiring tyrants; it also retains its appeal for intellectuals, who have proved equally skillful at rationalizing abuses of power and at exculpating themselves.
Interpretation
This quote critiques Marxism as a totalitarian ideology that enables tyranny, reflecting on its moral implications.
Joseph Sobran's quote expresses the belief that Marxism, by its very nature, allows for totalitarianism and lacks moral constraints on authority. He suggests that this ideology is attractive not only to those seeking power but also to intellectuals who can justify and excuse the oppressive actions of such regimes, revealing a deep skepticism about the compatibility of Marxism with humane governance.
In practice
During a debate on political ideologies, one might quote Sobran to emphasize the dangers of unfettered governmental power.
Man is the only creature disposed to kill huge numbers of members of his own species, and his instrument is usually the state.
The prospect of a government that treats all its citizens as criminal suspects is more terrifying than any terrorist. And even more frightening is a citizenry that can accept the surrender of its freedoms as the price of "freedom".
I am convinced that the act of thinking logically cannot possibly be natural to the human mind. If it were, then mathematics would be everybody's easiest course at school and our species would not have taken several millennia to figure out the scientific method.
What's the difference? How can people be so inconsistent? Why is it that free immigration was a good thing before 1914 and free immigration is a bad thing today? Well, there is a sense in which that answer is right. There's a sense in which free immigration, in the same sense as we had it before 1914 is not possible today. Why not?
..when, in my philosophical disquisitions, I deny a providence and a future state, I undermine not the foundations of society, but advance principles, which they themselves, upon their own topics, if they argue consistently, must allow to be solid and satisfactory.
What is all this juice and all this joy?_x000D_ _x000D_ A strain of the earth's sweet being in the beginning_x000D_ _x000D_ In Eden garden.-Have, get, before it cloy,_x000D_ _x000D_ Before it cloud, Christ, lord, and sour with sinning,_x000D_ _x000D_ Innocent mind and Mayday in girl and boy,_x000D_ _x000D_ Most, O maid's child, thy choice and worthy the winning.
He used this great, sad, motionless face to suggest various related things: a one-track mind near the track's end of pure insanity; mulish imperturbability under the wildest of circumstances; how dead a human being can get and still be alive . . .
Scenery is fine - but human nature is finer.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.