We have never observed infinity in nature. Whenever you have infinities in a theory, that's where the theory fails as a description of nature. And if space was born in the Big Bang, yet is infinite now, we are forced to believe that it's instantaneously, infinitely big. It seems absurd.
Interpretation
The quote discusses the paradoxes of infinity in the context of scientific theories about the universe.
Janna Levin highlights the challenges that arise when trying to reconcile the concept of infinity with our understanding of nature. In scientific theories, the presence of infinite quantities often leads to contradictions, especially when considering the origins of space in the Big Bang theory. Levin points out the absurdity of contemplating an infinite universe arising from a singular event, suggesting that these infinities indicate limitations in our theories rather than realities of nature.
In practice
In a lecture on modern cosmology, this quote could illustrate the complex nature of scientific theories.
The world of science and the world of literature have much in common. Each is an international club, helping to tie mankind together across barriers of nationality, race and language. I have been doubly lucky, being accepted as a member of both.
The cross pollination of disciplines is fundamental to truly revolutionary advances in our culture.
Eureka! Eureka!_x000D_ _x000D_ Supposed to have been his cry, jumping naked from his bath and running in the streets, excited by a discovery about water displacement to solve a problem about the purity of a gold crown.
My study is NOT as a climatologist, but from a completely different perspective in_x000D_ which I am an expert … For decades, as a professional experimental test engineer, I have analyzed experimental data and watched others massage and present data. I became a cynic; My conclusion - 'if someone is aggressively selling a technical product who's merits are dependent on complex experimental data, he is likely lying'. That is true whether the product is an airplane or a Carbon Credit.
Whoever wishes to acquire a deep acquaintance with Nature must observe that there are analogies which connect whole branches of science in a parallel manner, and enable us to infer of one class of phenomena what we know of another. It has thus happened on several occasions that the discovery of an unsuspected analogy between two branches of knowledge has been the starting point for a rapid course of discovery.
The growth of our understanding of the world through science weakens some of the motivation which makes people believers. But that's not the same thing as saying they're incompatible. It's just that I think some of the traditional reasons for belief, going back thousands of years, are rather undermined.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.