No one has a monopoly on knowledge the way that, say, IBM had in the 1960s in computing, or that Bell Labs had through the 1970s in communications. When useful knowledge exists in companies of all sizes and also in universities, non-profits and individual minds, it makes sense to orient your innovation efforts to accessing, building upon and integrating that external knowledge into useful products and services.
Open innovation is a paradigm that assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas, and internal and external paths to… - Henry Chesbrough
Open innovation is a paradigm that assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas, and internal and external paths to…
- Henry Chesbrough
No one has a monopoly on knowledge the way that, say, IBM had in the 1960s in computing, or that Bell Labs had through the 1970s in communications. W… - Henry Chesbrough
No one has a monopoly on knowledge the way that, say, IBM had in the 1960s in computing, or that Bell Labs had through the 1970s in communications. W…
Most innovations fail. And companies that don’t innovate die. - Henry Chesbrough
Most innovations fail. And companies that don’t innovate die.
In a world of widely distributed knowledge, companies cannot afford to rely entirely on their own research, but should instead buy or license process… - Henry Chesbrough
In a world of widely distributed knowledge, companies cannot afford to rely entirely on their own research, but should instead buy or license process…
Login to join the discussion
Login to join the discussion