One of the things that happens when you have austerity is that wages get lower, and some people think lower wages in the short run can increase corporate profits.
Interpretation
Austerity can lead to lower wages, which some believe may boost corporate profits temporarily.
This quote by Joseph Stiglitz addresses the paradoxical notion that implementing austerity measures can reduce wages, potentially leading to short-term increases in corporate profits. It highlights the complex relationship between wage levels, corporate profitability, and the broader economic impact of austerity policies, suggesting that short-term gains for businesses can come at the expense of workers' livelihoods.
In practice
Discussing the economic impacts of austerity measures in a public forum.
Free migration within Europe means that countries that have done a better job at reducing unemployment will predictably end up with more than their fair share of refugees. Workers in these countries bear the cost in depressed wages and higher unemployment, while employers benefit from cheaper labor.
I don't think we can have democracies that work where most of the people are not benefiting economically, where most of the people are worried about their job security.
Let me put it very forcefully: No large economy has ever recovered from an economic downturn through austerity. It's not going to happen in the United States, and it's not going to happen in Europe.
What separates developing countries from developed countries is as much a gap in knowledge as a gap in resources.
One of the arguments I make for the failure of the euro is that, at the time it was being constructed, there was a 'neo-liberal' ideology which said that all we need to do to make this thing work is to get deficits low, keep inflation low, and take down barriers, and then everything would be fine.
Trump sees the world in terms of a zero-sum game. In reality, globalisation, if well managed, is a positive-sum force: America gains if its friends and allies - whether Australia, the E.U., or Mexico - are stronger. But Trump's approach threatens to turn it into a negative-sum game: America will lose, too.
The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist.
All taxes, except a 'lump-sum tax,' introduce distortions in the economy. But no government can impose a lump-sum tax - the same amount for everyone regardless of their income or expenditures - because it would fall heaviest on those with less income, and it would grind the poor, who might be unable to pay it at all.
When money is controlled by a few it gives that few an undue power and control over labor and the resources of the country. Labor will have its best return when the laborer can control its disposal.
The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income as defined by the GDP.
Economics is a choice between alternatives all the time. Those are the trade-offs.
The Federal Budget can and should be made an instrument of prosperity and stability, not a deterrent to recovery.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.