Americans swept away the instruments of English hereditary inequality - entails and titles of nobility - even before we had a constitution.
It was one time when people thought the value of the fine structure constant was important. Now of course it's still important, of course, as a practical matter,but we now know that the value it has is a function, that in any fundamental theory you derive the fine structure constant as a function of all sorts of mass ratios and so on and it's not really that fundamental.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The fine structure constant, once seen as paramount, is now understood to be derived from deeper principles in physics.
Steven Weinberg's quote highlights the evolution of our understanding of fundamental constants in physics, specifically the fine structure constant. Initially regarded as a key value, ongoing research has revealed that its significance is more nuanced; it is not an intrinsic feature of nature but rather a derived quantity influenced by various mass ratios and theoretical frameworks. This reflects the complex interplay between empirical observation and theoretical interpretation in the quest for a deeper understanding of the universe.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a physics lecture on the constants of nature, one might use this quote to illustrate the evolving understanding in the field.
More from Steven Weinberg
All quotes →It's very difficult to convince other countries that they shouldn't pursue nuclear weapons programs if we ourselves are actively developing a component of a strategic defense system.
[Science] is corrosive of religious belief, and it's a good thing too.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
I'm offended by the kind of smarmy religiosity that's all around us, perhaps more in America than in Europe, and not really that harmful because it's not really that intense or even that serious, but just... you know after a while you get tired of hearing clergymen giving the invocation at various public celebrations and you feel, haven't we outgrown all this? Do we have to listen to this?
How strange it would be if the final theory were to be discovered in our lifetimes! The discovery of the final laws of nature will mark a discontinuity in human intellectual history, the sharpest that has occurred since the beginning of modern science in the seventeenth century. Can we now imagine what that would be like?
Similar quotes
To the field of synthetic chemistry belongs an array of responsibilities which are crucial for the future of mankind, not only with regard to the health and needs of our society, but also for the attainment of a deep understanding of matter, chemical change, and life.
Global warming is controversial, of course, but the controversy is mainly over whether human activity is driving it.
Man is slightly nearer to the atom than to the star. ... From his central position man can survey the grandest works of Nature with the astronomer, or the minutest works with the physicist. ... [K]nowledge of the stars leads through the atom; and important knowledge of the atom has been reached through the stars.
The brain of man, like that of all animals is double, being parted down its centre by a thin membrane. For this reason pain is not always felt in the same part of the head, but sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other, and occasionally all over.
Language is only the instrument of science, and words are but the signs of ideas.
For anyone inclined to caricature environmental history as 'environmental determinism,' the contrasting histories of the Dominican Republic and Haiti provide a useful antidote. Yes, environmental problems do constrain human societies, but the societies' responses also make a difference.