'Science in itself' is nothing, for it exists only in the human beings who are its bearers. 'Science for its own sake' usually means nothing more than science for the sake of the people who happen to be pursuing it.
People think if you have deciphered the genome of humans that you can change everything. But you cannot change everything, because you do not know what the genes mean, and you have no methods for changing them, and you can't do experiments with humans like you can with animals.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Understanding the human genome does not equate to controlling or altering it completely due to the complexity of genetic functions and ethical constraints.
Christiane Nusslein-Volhard highlights the limitations of genomic research by illustrating that while decoding the human genome may seem like a powerful tool for change, true comprehension of genetic implications and ethical experimentation is far more complex. The quote underscores the distinction between mere knowledge and the practical ability to manipulate that knowledge within ethical boundaries, especially when it comes to human subjects.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on genetic engineering, this quote can illustrate the ethical dilemmas scientists face.
Similar quotes
Dreams about the future are always filled with gadgets.
The question of whether or to what extent human activities are causing global warming is not a matter of ideology, let alone of belief. The issue is simply one of risk management.
The heart of the matter, as I see it, is the stark fact that world poverty is primarily a problem of two million villages, and thus a problem of two thousand million villagers.
Evolution is a fact. It is the best explanation of what is known from observations. It's a theory as powerful as the theory of gravity.
Agriculture is the backbone of the livelihood security system of nearly 700 million people in the country and we need to build our food security on the foundation of home grown food.