If people are going to do post-publication peer review, they need to abide by the same rules as they abide by for pre-publication peer review: not be…

- Susan Fiske

It is typical for implicit status hierarchies of influence and esteem to emerge in interpersonal encounters, especially those that are goal oriented.

- Susan Fiske

If you are doing a peer review of somebody's paper before publication, the editor would not allow you to speculate about the person's motives, about …

- Susan Fiske

I publish things that in my judgment are good science.

- Susan Fiske

Some people have set up sort of "gotcha" algorithms that apparently crawl through psychology articles and look for fraudulent p-values [a measure of …

- Susan Fiske

If you have an effect that nobody can replicate, then your phenomenon fades away. So if you want to to have a legacy, then you jolly well better have…

- Susan Fiske

Promoting open and critical and respectful scientific discourse seems like a pretty good goal to me.

- Susan Fiske

I think there's a huge difference between describing norms in a vivid way and singling out individual people.

- Susan Fiske

In these unfiltered, un-moderated social media posts people are speculating about others' motivations. And you could no more put that in a peer revie…

- Susan Fiske