Poets are being pursued by the philosophers today, out of the poverty of philosophy. God damn it, you might think a man had no business to be writing, to be a poet unless some philosophic stinker gave him permission.
Poetry demands a different material than prose. It uses another facet of the same fact... the spontaneous conformation of language as it is heard.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Poetry and prose differ in their use of language and expressiveness, with poetry capturing the essence of language as it resonates with the reader.
In this quote, William Carlos Williams emphasizes the distinct nature of poetry compared to prose. He suggests that poetry requires a unique approach to language, utilizing its auditory qualities and emotional impact to convey meaning in a way that prose cannot. By declaring that poetry engages with the spontaneous nature of language as it is perceived, he highlights the art form's ability to evoke feelings and thoughts through its rhythmic and musical qualities.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a literature class, this quote could be used to spark discussion on the differences between poetic and prose forms.
More from William Carlos Williams
All quotes βFor the beginning is assuredly the end- since we know nothing, pure and simple, beyond our own complexities.
It was the love of love, the love of swallows up all else, a grateful love, a love of natural, of people, of animals, a love ingengering gentleness and goodness that moved meand that I saw in you
O frost bitten blossoms, That are unfolding your wings From out the envious black branches. Bloom quickly and make much of the sunshine. The twigs conspire against you! Hear hem! They hold you from behind.
No opinion can be trusted; even the facts may be nothing but a printer's error.
It is almost impossible to state what one in fact believes, because it is almost impossible to hold a belief and to define it at the same time.
Similar quotes
I don't have stylistic loyalty. That's why people perceive me changing all the time. But there is a real continuity in my subject matter. As an artist of artifice, I do believe I have more integrity than any one of my contemporaries.
The big cop-out would be to accept popularity rather than opting to try to create potent work. It's so easy to do the popular thing, the expected thing, and that's where you start to cheat yourself - and your fans, in the end - because there's an inherent dishonesty in pandering and dishing up what everyone's expecting.
Literature is invention. Fiction is fiction. To call a story a true story is an insult to both art and truth.
Who would dare assign to art the sterile function of imitating nature?
I can't say what people use the experience of listening to songs for, but I would never tell somebody what it is supposed to mean. That defeats the purpose of making it. Hopefully, whoever connects with it connects with it in their own way, and it can mean whatever it is supposed to mean to them.
For me, it is freedom, freedom from everything: when I write, I'm not a woman. I'm not a Muslim. I'm not a Moroccan. I can reinvent myself, and I can reinvent the world.