If you ask almost any of them, 'Do you stand behind your theory? Is this the answer?' I think almost everyone would say, 'No, no, no. I'm just trying to expand the range of possibilities.' We really don't know what's going on.
All policies should be guided by science, not just whose voice is the loudest.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Policy decisions should be based on scientific evidence rather than on popular opinion or noise.
This quote emphasizes the importance of science in forming policies. It suggests that effective policy-making should rely on factual data and empirical research, rather than being swayed by influential individuals or groups who may shout the loudest. By advocating for science as the guiding principle, the quote highlights the need for rational and evidence-based approaches in governance, ensuring that decisions benefit society as a whole.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on environmental regulations, this quote can be used to stress the importance of scientific research in policymaking.
Similar quotes
Haemoglobin is a very large molecule by ordinary standards, containing about ten thousand atoms, but the chances are that your haemoglobin and mine are identical, and significantly different from that of a pig or horse. You may be impressed by how much human beings differ from one another, but if you were to look into the fine details of the molecules of which they are constructed, you would be astonished by their similarity.
The internal machinery of life, the chemistry of the parts, is something beautiful. And it turns out that all life is interconnected with all other life.
It is not a simple matter to differentiate unsuccessful from successful experiments. . . .[Most] work that is finally successful is the result of a series of unsuccessful tests in which difficulties are gradually eliminated.
This is a basic problem, to feed 6.6 billion people. Without fertilizer, forget it. The game is over.
Space or science fiction has become a dialect for our time.