If one harbours anywhere in one's mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, although in a sense known to be true, are inadmissible.
George OrwellRead
Political writing in our time consists almost entirely of prefabricated phrases bolted together like the pieces of a child's Meccano set. It is the unavoidable result of self-censorship. To write in plain, vigorous language one has to think fearlessly, and if one thinks fearlessly one cannot be politically orthodox.
Interpretation
Political writing is often formulaic due to self-censorship and lacks genuine thought.
In this quote, George Orwell critiques the state of political writing in his time, suggesting that it has devolved into a rigid collection of clichés and pre-formulated expressions. He argues that true clarity and strength in writing require fearless thinking, which challenges the conventional political norms and orthodoxy that often stifle honest communication.
In practice
This quote could be used in a speech about the importance of authenticity in journalism.
If one harbours anywhere in one's mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, although in a sense known to be true, are inadmissible.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Not to expose your true feelings to an adult seems to be instinctive from the age of seven or eight onwards.
As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents.
It is fatal to look hungry. It makes people want to kick you.
I sometimes think that the price of liberty is not so much eternal vigilance as eternal dirt.
Any attempts by any government to change Community legislation to its own wishes are doomed to failure following the extension of policy areas now subject to majority voting... In our opinion, this must have serious implications for the traditional view of Parliament as a legislative body sovereignty.
This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia, where Russia can threaten its neighbors, occupy a capital, overthrow a government, and get away with it. Things have changed.
Russian Parliament today is a bunch of puppets that just fall in with the instructions from Kremlin.
Policy is largely set by economic elites and organized groups representing business interests with little concern for public attitudes or public safety, as long as the public remains passive and obedient.
In the final analysis it doesn't really matter what the political system is...We don't need perfect political systems; we need perfect participation.
What did the president know, and when did he know it?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.