Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio.
Thomas MalthusRead
Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio. A slight acquaintance with numbers will shew the immensity of the first power in comparison of the second.
Interpretation
Unchecked population growth can rapidly outpace food supply growth, leading to potential scarcity.
This quote by Thomas Malthus illustrates the disparity between population growth and the growth of resources such as food. Malthus argues that while population can increase exponentially, resources tend to grow linearly, which can lead to serious issues of overpopulation and resource depletion if not managed properly.
In practice
In a lecture on sustainability, I used this quote to highlight the importance of managing population growth alongside resource management.
Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio.
The prodigious waste of human life occasioned by this perpetual struggle for room and food, was more than supplied by the mighty power of population, acting, in some degree, unshackled, from the constant habit of emigration.
The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man.
The rich, by unfair combinations, contribute frequently to prolong a season of distress among the poor.
In a state therefore of great equality and virtue, where pure and simple manners prevailed, the increase of the human species would evidently be much greater than any increase that has been hitherto known.
I think it will be found that experience, _x000D_ the true source and foundation of all knowledge, _x000D_ invariably confirms its truth.
When it comes to the things that people really want in science fiction - like space travel - the simplest things end up causing them not to happen. Humans are 100-pound bags of water, built to live on Earth.
The way life manages information involves a logical structure that differs fundamentally from mere complex chemistry. Therefore chemistry alone will not explain life's origin, any more than a study of silicon, copper and plastic will explain how a computer can execute a program.
A lot of the things you see in science fiction revolve around black holes because black holes are strong enough to rip the fabric of space and time.
We should've asked China to be a portion of the space station. We should've worked out ways that we can... just give away the technology that we have that puts things up into space, with cooperation up above the atmosphere that's needed to help each other.
Very many maintain that all we know is still infinitely less than all that still remains unknown.
We didn't go to the moon to explore or because it was in our DNA or because we're Americans. We went because we were at war and we felt a threat.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.