The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
Rebecca MackinnonRead
The potential for the abuse of power through digital networks - upon which we the people now depend for nearly everything, including our politics - is one of the most insidious threats to democracy in the Internet age.
Interpretation
Digital networks can lead to power abuses that threaten democracy.
Rebecca Mackinnon's quote highlights the dangers inherent in our reliance on digital networks for various aspects of life, including governance. She points out that as we increasingly depend on these platforms, the risk of power being misused rises significantly, posing a severe threat to democratic principles and practices in the modern age.
In practice
During a lecture on digital rights, this quote can illustrate the importance of safeguarding democracy.
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
In China, the problem is that with the system of censorship that's now in place, the user doesn't know to what extent, why, and under what authority there's been censorship. There's no way of appealing. There's no due process.
Citizens' rights cannot be protected if their digital activities are governed and policed by opaque and publicly unaccountable corporate mechanisms.
If a British government experienced such a long and persistent resistance to domestic policy in England, then that policy would almost certainly be changed... We have asserted that we are political prisoners, and everything about out country - our arrests, interrogations, trials, and prison conditions - show that we are politically motivated.
Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor - with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant funds demanded. Yet, in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have been quite real.
That a peasant may become king does not render the kingdom democratic.
The statesman who yields to war fever must realise that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events.
In America any boy may become President, and I suppose it's just one of the risks he takes.
Of course, there is no question that Libya - and the world - will be better off with Gaddafi out of power. I, along with many other world leaders, have embraced that goal, and will actively pursue it through non-military means. But broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.