The great philosophers and the great works are standards for the selection of what is essential. Everything that we do in studying the history of philosophy ultimately serves their better understanding.
Karl JaspersRead
At the present moment, the security of coherent philosophy, which existed from Parmenides to Hegel, is lost.
Interpretation
This quote reflects the loss of a unified philosophical framework that has persisted through history.
Karl Jaspers suggests that there has been a significant shift in philosophy, where the cohesive understanding that connected thinkers from Parmenides to Hegel has now fractured. This loss implies a challenge in finding a stable foundation for philosophical inquiry in contemporary times, leading to a state of disarray in understanding life's fundamental truths.
In practice
In a lecture on the history of philosophy, one might quote Jaspers to highlight the challenges of modern philosophical thought.
The great philosophers and the great works are standards for the selection of what is essential. Everything that we do in studying the history of philosophy ultimately serves their better understanding.
The community of masses of human beings has produced an order of life in regulated channels which connects individuals in a technically functioning organisation, but not inwardly from the historicity of their souls.
We must learn to talk with each other, and we mutually must understand and accept one another in our extraordinary differences.
The study of law left me unsatisfied, because I did not know the aspects of life which it serves. I perceived only the intricate mental juggling with fictions that did not interest me.
If philosophy is practice, a demand to know the manner in which its history is to be studied is entailed: a theoretical attitude toward it becomes real only in the living appropriation of its contents from the texts.
Reason is like an open secret that can become known to anyone at any time; it is the quiet space into which everyone can enter through his own thought
We have two alternatives: either we question our beliefs - or we don't. Either we accept our fixed versions of reality- or we begin to challenge them. In Buddha's opinion, to train in staying open and curious - to train in dissolving our assumptions and beliefs - is the best use of our human lives.
Whether humanity is to comprehensively prosper...depends entirely on the integrity of the human individuals and not on the political and economic systems. The cosmic question has been asked: are humans worthwhile to universe invention?
In April 1917 the illusion of isolation was destroyed, America came to the end of innocence, and of the exuberant freedom of bachelor independence. That the responsibilities of world power have not made us happier is no surprise. To help ourselves manage them, we have replaced the illusion of isolation with a new illusion of omnipotence.
The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: that there is no man really clever who has not found that he is stupid.
One of the major differences I see in the political climate today is that there is less collective support for coming to critical consciousness β in communities, in institutions, among friends.
The foundation of reverence is this perception, that the present holds within itself the complete sum of existence, backwards and forwards, that whole amplitude of time, which is eternity.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.