The great philosophers and the great works are standards for the selection of what is essential. Everything that we do in studying the history of philosophy ultimately serves their better understanding.
Karl JaspersRead
At the present moment, the security of coherent philosophy, which existed from Parmenides to Hegel, is lost.
Interpretation
This quote reflects the loss of a unified philosophical framework that has persisted through history.
Karl Jaspers suggests that there has been a significant shift in philosophy, where the cohesive understanding that connected thinkers from Parmenides to Hegel has now fractured. This loss implies a challenge in finding a stable foundation for philosophical inquiry in contemporary times, leading to a state of disarray in understanding life's fundamental truths.
In practice
In a lecture on the history of philosophy, one might quote Jaspers to highlight the challenges of modern philosophical thought.
The great philosophers and the great works are standards for the selection of what is essential. Everything that we do in studying the history of philosophy ultimately serves their better understanding.
The community of masses of human beings has produced an order of life in regulated channels which connects individuals in a technically functioning organisation, but not inwardly from the historicity of their souls.
We must learn to talk with each other, and we mutually must understand and accept one another in our extraordinary differences.
The study of law left me unsatisfied, because I did not know the aspects of life which it serves. I perceived only the intricate mental juggling with fictions that did not interest me.
If philosophy is practice, a demand to know the manner in which its history is to be studied is entailed: a theoretical attitude toward it becomes real only in the living appropriation of its contents from the texts.
Reason is like an open secret that can become known to anyone at any time; it is the quiet space into which everyone can enter through his own thought
How can we find spiritual meaning in a scientific worldview? Spirituality is a way of being in the world, a sense of oneβs place in the cosmos, a relationship to that which extends beyond oneself. . . . Does scientific explanation of the world diminish its spiritual beauty? I think not. Science and spirituality are complementary, not conflicting; additive, not detractive. Anything that generates a sense of awe may be a source of spirituality. Science does this in spades. (158-159)
Realize deeply that the present moment is all you ever have. Make the Now the primary focus of your life.
A farmer's horse is never lame, never unfit to go. Never throws out curbs, never breaks down before or behind. Like his master he is never showy. He does not paw and prance, and arch his neck, and bid the world admire his beauties...and when he is wanted, he can always do his work.
We have become indifferent to content, and react, not even to form, but to technique, to technical efficiency itself.
For the message of television as metaphor is not only that all the world is a stage but that the stage is located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of all money?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.