At a certain point, what people mean when they use a word becomes its meaning.
William SafireRead
Previously known for its six syllables of sweetness and light, reconciliation has become the political fighting word of the year.
Interpretation
Reconciliation, once a positive concept, has turned into a contentious political term.
William Safire's quote highlights the transformation of the term 'reconciliation' from a symbol of unity and healing to one associated with political strife and contention. It reflects how language can change in meaning based on context and usage, especially in the realm of politics, where terms can evoke strong emotions and differing interpretations.
In practice
In a discussion about recent political events, one might say, 'Reconciliation has become the political fighting word of the year.'
At a certain point, what people mean when they use a word becomes its meaning.
Dangling punch lines to forgotten stories remain in the language like the smile of the Cheshire cat.
Never assume the obvious is true.
Stop worrying about the 'dumbing down' of our language by bloggers, tweeters, cableheads and MSM thumbsuckers engaged in a 'race to the bottom' of the page by little minds confined to little words.
Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy? I don't know and I don't care.
Sometimes I know the meaning of a word but am tired of it and feel the need for an unfamiliar, especially precise or poetic term, perhaps one with a nuance that flatters my readership's exquisite sensitivity.
Corruption is a cancer: a cancer that eats away at a citizen's faith in democracy, diminishes the instinct for innovation and creativity; already-tight national budgets, crowding out important national investments. It wastes the talent of entire generations. It scares away investments and jobs.
But as the arms-control scholar Thomas Schelling once noted, two things are very expensive in international life: promises when they succeed and threats when they fail.
The history of ancient and modern republics had taught them that many of the evils which those republics suffered arose from the want of a certain balance, and that mutual control indispensable to a wise administration. They were convinced that popular assemblies are frequently misguided by ignorance, by sudden impulses, and the intrigues of ambitious men; and that some firm barrier against these operations was necessary. They, therefore, instituted your Senate.
The "progressives" who today masquerade as "liberals" may rant against "fascism"; yet it is their policy that paves the way for Hitlerism. Nothing could have been more helpful to the success of the National-Socialist (Nazi) movement than the methods used by the "progressives," denouncing Nazism as a party serving the interests of "capital." The German workers knew this tactic too well to be deceived by it again.
U.S. analysts estimate that Russian military expenditures have tripled during the Bush-Putin years, in large measure a predicted reaction to the Bush administration's militancy and aggressiveness.
Whoever decides to dedicate their life to politics knows that earning money isn't the top priority.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.