We know that once we stop learning and call ourselves learned, we become useless members of the scientific society.
Christian De DuveRead
If you equate the probability of the birth of a bacteria cell to chance assembly of its atoms, eternity will not suffice to produce one Faced with the enormous sum of lucky draws behind the success of the evolutionary game, one may legitimately wonder to what extent this success is actually written into the fabric of the universe.
Interpretation
The complexity of life raises questions about the role of chance in evolution.
Christian De Duve highlights the improbability of life emerging from random atomic arrangements, suggesting that the success of evolution may not simply be a matter of chance but instead hints at a deeper design or order within the universe. This thought-provoking statement encourages us to contemplate the intricate processes that led to the development of life and the universe we observe today.
In practice
During a lecture on evolution, one might quote this to illustrate the complexity of life's origins.
We know that once we stop learning and call ourselves learned, we become useless members of the scientific society.
When somebody discovers something like the quadratic formula or the Pythagorean theorem, the convention in science is that he can't control that idea. He has to give it away. He publishes it. What's rewarded in science is dissemination of ideas.
To invoke the origin of the DNA/protein machine by invoking a supernatural Designer is to explain precisely nothing - for it leaves unexplained the origin of the Designer.
The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.
The overwhelming majority of theories are rejected because they contain bad explanations, not because they fail experimental tests.
If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.
The act of smelling something, anything, is remarkably like the act of thinking. Immediately at the moment of perception, you can feel the mind going to work, sending the odor around from place to place, setting off complex repertories through the brain, polling one center after another for signs of re recognition, for old memories and old connection.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.