There are... for us no instincts—we no longer need the term in psychology. Everything we have been in the habit of calling an 'instinct' today is a result largely of training—belonging to man's learned behavior.
John B. WatsonRead
Psychology, as the behaviorist views it, is a purely objective, experimental branch of natural science which needs introspection as little as do the sciences of chemistry and physics.... The position is taken here that the behavior of man and the behavior of animals must be considered in the same plane.
Interpretation
Watson argues that psychology should be an objective and empirical science, akin to chemistry and physics.
John B. Watson's quote emphasizes the objective nature of psychology as a scientific field, advocating that it should be studied experimentally and without relying on introspection. He asserts that the behaviors of humans and animals should be analyzed in a similar manner, suggesting that the principles of behavior are universal and that psychological science should align with the rigor found in the natural sciences.
In practice
In a psychology conference to highlight the importance of empirical research methods.
There are... for us no instincts—we no longer need the term in psychology. Everything we have been in the habit of calling an 'instinct' today is a result largely of training—belonging to man's learned behavior.
The Behaviorist cannot find consciousness in the test-tube of his science.
We are survival machines – robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes. This is a truth which still fills me with astonishment.
Any objective look at what science has to say about climate change ought to be sufficient to persuade reasonable people that the climate is changing and that humans are responsible for a substantial part of that - and that these changes are doing harm and will continue to do more harm unless we start to reduce our emissions.
One of the things that science fiction gets to do is thought experiments about the human condition that would be impractical or unethical to conduct in real life.
It seems sensible to discard all hope of observing hitherto unobservable quantities, such as the position and period of the electron... Instead it seems more reasonable to try to establish a theoretical quantum mechanics, analogous to classical mechanics, but in which only relations between observable quantities occur.
I think that the future of the human race is to spread through the universe, and now is the time that we should be laying the foundations for that.
Black holes, we all know, are these regions where if an object falls in, it can't get out, but the puzzle that many struggled with over the decades is, what happens to the information that an object contains when it falls into a black hole. Is it simply lost?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.