The idea that political freedom can be preserved in the absence of economic freedom, and vice versa, is an illusion. Political freedom is the corollary of economic freedom.
Ludwig Von MisesRead
The public firm can nowhere maintain itself in free competition with the private firm; it is possible today only where it has a monopoly that excludes competition. Even that alone is evidence of its lesser economic productivity.
Interpretation
Public firms struggle to compete with private firms in free markets unless they hold a monopoly, which indicates lower productivity.
Ludwig Von Mises argues that public firms are unable to effectively compete with private firms in competitive markets. The statement suggests that public companies can only thrive when they possess monopolistic power, which in itself reflects a deficiency in economic efficiency and productivity compared to their private counterparts. This highlights the inherent advantages of private enterprise in driving productivity through competition.
In practice
This quote could be referenced in an economics class when discussing market structures.
The idea that political freedom can be preserved in the absence of economic freedom, and vice versa, is an illusion. Political freedom is the corollary of economic freedom.
Wars of aggression are popular nowadays with those nations convinced that only victory and conquest could improve their material well-being.
Only stilted pedants can conceive the idea that there are absolute norms to tell what is beautiful and what is not. They try to derive from the works of the past a code of rules with which, as they fancy, the writers and artists of the future should comply. But the genius does not cooperate with the pundit.
The most serious dangers for American freedom and the American way of life do not come from without.
Each epoch has found in the Gospels what it sought to find there, and has overlooked what it wished to overlook.
Whoever prefers life to death, happiness to suffering, well-being to misery must defend without compromise private ownership in the means of production.
We used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession and increase employment by cutting taxes and boosting government spending. I tell you in all candour that that option no longer exists, and in so far as it ever did exist, it only worked on each occasion since the war by injecting a bigger dose of inflation into the economy, followed by a higher level of unemployment as the next step.
How very popular to say, 'spend more on this, expend more on that.' And of course, we all have our favorite causes; I know I do. But someone has to add up the figures. Every business has to do it, every housewife has to do it, [and] every government should do it.
The true law of economics is chance, and we learned people arbitrarily seize on a few moments and establish them as laws.
Those who advocate devaluation are calling for a reduction in the wage levels and the real wage standards of every member of the working class.
Why does a public discussion of economic policy so often show the abysmal ignorance of the participants?
The raw fact is that every successful example of economic development this past century ... has taken place via globalization.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.