Never limit yourself because of others' limited imagination; never limit others because of your own limited imagination.
Mae JemisonRead
The reality is the majority of us will not get off this planet. So the long run is, some kind of space exploration has to benefit us here on Earth.
Interpretation
Space exploration should ultimately benefit life on Earth.
Mae Jemison highlights the importance of space exploration in improving life on our planet. She emphasizes that while most of humanity may never venture into space, the advancements and knowledge gained from such exploration should be leveraged to address challenges faced on Earth, ultimately linking our progress in science and technology to the betterment of human existence.
In practice
In a speech about the future of technology, one might quote this to emphasize the importance of investing in space programs.
Never limit yourself because of others' limited imagination; never limit others because of your own limited imagination.
Greatness can be captured in one word: lifestyle. Life is God's gift to you, style is what you make of it.
To survive as a species on this planet, we're going to have to see ourselves as Earthlings.
We look at science as something very elite, which only a few people can learn. That's just not true. You just have to start early and give kids a foundation. Kids live up, or down, to expectations.
Intuitive versus analytical? That's a foolish choice. It's foolish, just like trying to choose between being realistic or idealistic. You need both in life.
I had great mentors in my parents who always sought to understand the world around them. And they would push me to really think things through.
On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, we gain no scientific explanation.
[Bacteria] have an incredibly complicated chemical lexicon that ... allows bacteria to be multicellular. In the spirit of TED they're doing things together because it makes a difference.
All you are is a bag of particles acting out the laws of physics. That to me is pretty clear.
What we eat has changed more in the last 40 years than in the previous 40,000. The survival of the current food system depends upon widespread ignorance of how it really operates.
My expertise is the space program and what it should be in the future based on my experience of looking at the transitions that we've made between pre-Sputnik days and getting to the moon.
Subatomic particles do not exist but rather show 'tendencies to exist', and atomic events do not occur with certainty at definite times and in definite ways, but rather show 'tendencies to occur'.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.