There can be no rise in the value of labour without a fall of profits.
Interpretation
This quote indicates that increasing the value of labor will necessitate a decrease in profits for employers.
David Ricardo's quote highlights a fundamental principle in economics: the relationship between labor costs and profits. When the value of labor rises—such as through higher wages—employers may see their profits decline, as they must allocate more resources to pay workers. This reflects the tension in economic systems between the needs of laborers for fair compensation and the desire of business owners to maximize their profitability.
In practice
In a discussion about wage increases at a company meeting.
If a commodity were in no way useful, - in other words, if it could in no way contribute to our gratification, - it would be destitute of exchangeable value, however scarce it might be, or whatever quantity of labour might be necessary to procure it.
In stating the principles which regulate exchangeable value and price, we should carefully distinguish between those variations which belong to the commodity itself, and those which are occasioned by a variation in the medium in which value is estimated, or price expressed.
By far the greatest part of those goods which are the objects of desire, are procured by labour and they may be multiplied, not in one country alone, but in many, almost without any assignable limit, if we are disposed to bestow the labour necessary to obtain them.
It is here we come to the heart of the matter. The economic principle of comparative advantage', 'a country may, in return for manufactured commodities, import corn even if it can be grown with less labour than in the country from which it is imported
It is worth noting that 'too big to fail' is not simply about size. A big institution is 'too big' when there is an expectation that government will do whatever it takes to rescue that institution from failure, thus bestowing an effective risk premium subsidy. Reforms to end 'too big to fail' must address the causes of this expectation.
Tax laws favor capital over labor, giving capital gains a lower rate than ordinary income. The rich get humongous mortgage interest deductions while renters get no deduction at all.
Over the years, the U.S. economy has shown a remarkable ability to absorb shocks of all kinds, to recover, and to continue to grow. Flexible and efficient markets for labor and capital, an entrepreneurial tradition, and a general willingness to tolerate and even embrace technological and economic change all contribute to this resiliency.
I'm quite worried about the fiscal imbalances that we've got and what that might mean in terms of financial crisis ahead.
The thing I've learned most about poverty is how expensive it is to be poor. It's super easy to pay rent every month if you earn enough to pay rent and have a decent job. It's super hard to pay rent if you need a coupon from the state and then need to go find an apartment that will accept that coupon and only that coupon.
It is better that a man should tyrannize over his bank balance than over his fellow-citizens.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.