Robots will neither be common nor very good in 2014, but they will be in existence.
Interpretation
Asimov predicts the presence of robots in our lives by 2014, though he casts doubt on their quality and commonality.
In this quote, Isaac Asimov acknowledges that while robots will be present in society by 2014, they will not yet be widespread or highly functional. This reflects his foresight into the slow yet inevitable progression of robotics and artificial intelligence, suggesting that technological advancement is a gradual process rather than an instantaneous leap.
In practice
In a discussion about future technologies, you might reference Asimov's quote to highlight the evolution of robotics.
Democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines, but it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies.
Science does not promise absolute truth, nor does it consider that such a thing necessarily exists. Science does not even promise that everything in the Universe is amenable to the scientific process.
Democracy cannot survive overpopulation.
Although the time of death is approaching me, I am not afraid of dying and going to Hell or (what would be considerably worse) going to the popularized version of Heaven. I expect death to be nothingness and, for removing me from all possible fears of death, I am thankful to atheism.
A subtle thought that is in error may yet give rise to fruitful inquiry that can establish truths of great value.
During the century after Newton, it was still possible for a man of unusual attainments to master all fields of scientific knowledge. But by 1800, this had become entirely impracticable.
The speed of communications is wondrous to behold. It is also true that speed can multiply the distribution of information that we know to be untrue.
We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.
To me programming is more than an important practical art. It is also a gigantic undertaking in the foundations of knowledge.
I'm interested in Linux because of the technology, and Linux wasn't started as any kind of rebellion against the 'evil Microsoft empire.'
It's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing.
I'm struck by the insidious, computer-driven tendency to take things out of the domain of muscular activity and put them into the domain of mental activity.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.