Science and fiction both begin with similar questions: What if? Why? How does it all work? But they focus on different areas of life on earth.
Interpretation
Science and fiction explore fundamental questions about existence but differ in their approaches and focus.
In this quote, Margaret Atwood highlights the shared curiosity that fuels both science and fiction, as they both seek to explore profound questions about reality. While science delves into the empirical and tangible aspects of life, fiction allows for imaginative explorations, each enriching our understanding of the world in distinct yet complementary ways.
In practice
In a book club discussing speculative fiction, one could use this quote to illustrate the connection between scientific inquiry and creative storytelling.
If I am good enough and quiet enough, perhaps after all they will let me go; but it’s not easy being quiet and good, it’s like hanging on to the edge of a bridge when you’ve already fallen over; you don’t seem to be moving, just dangling there, and yet it is taking all your strength.
I would like to believe this is a story I’m telling. I need to believe it. I must believe it. Those who can believe that such stories are only stories have a better chance. If it’s a story I’m telling, then I have control over the ending. Then there will be an ending, to the story, and real life will come after it. I can pick up where I left off.
What else can I do? Once you've gone this far you aren't fit for anything else. Something happens to your mind. You're overqualified, overspecialized, and everybody knows it. Nobody in any other game would be crazy enough to hire me. I wouldn't even make a good ditch-digger, I'd start tearing apart the sewer-system, trying to pick-axe and unearth all those chthonic symbols - pipes, valves, cloacal conduits... No, no. I'll have to be a slave in the paper-mines for all time.
We love each other, that’s true whatever it means, but we aren’t good at it; for some it’s a talent, for others only an addiction.
I've learned quite a lot, over the years, by avoiding what I was supposed to be learning.
Knowing too much about other people puts you in their power, they have a claim on you, you are forced to understand their reasons for doing things and then you are weakened.
The distribution of species on islands and continents throughout the world is exactly what you'd expect if evolution was a fact. The distribution of fossils in space and in time are exactly what you would expect if evolution were a fact. There are millions of facts all pointing in the same direction and no facts pointing in the wrong direction.
I’ve spent something like 17 years working on a theory for which there is essentially no direct experimental support.
I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind.
The 2nd law of thermodynamics has the same degree of truth as the statement that if you throw a tumblerful of water into the sea, you cannot get the same tumblerful of water out again.
If the fate of the universe was decided in a single moment at the instant of the Big Bang , that was the most creative moment of all.
Science has faith. We make postulates. We can't prove those postulates, but we have faith in them.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.