The imposing edifice of science provides a challenging view of what can be achieved by the accumulation of many small efforts in a steady objective and dedicated search for truth.
Charles H. TownesRead
Science has faith. We make postulates. We can't prove those postulates, but we have faith in them.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that science relies on fundamental assumptions that cannot be proven but are accepted based on faith.
Charles H. Townes highlights the underlying faith that scientists must have in their foundational assumptions or postulates. Even though these postulates cannot be conclusively proven, they serve as the bedrock upon which scientific inquiry and discovery are built. This indicates that science is not purely about proof but also about belief in the principles that guide exploration and understanding.
In practice
In a science class discussing the foundations of scientific law.
The imposing edifice of science provides a challenging view of what can be achieved by the accumulation of many small efforts in a steady objective and dedicated search for truth.
I don't think that science is complete at all. We don't understand everything, and one can see, within science itself, there are many inconsistencies. We just have to accept that we don't understand.
One of the things my family taught me - I think very important in religion and science - is that you must be ready to stand up for what you think. Decide what you really think is best, and stick with it.
I knew I wanted to be a scientist. Which kind of scientist was the question.
The development of science is basically a social phenomenon, dependent on hard work and mutual support of many scientists and on the societies in which they live.
It was strange, in a way, because there were no ideas involved in the laser that weren't already known by somebody 25 years before lasers were discovered. The ideas were all there; just, nobody put it together.
If you think that the distance from the Earth to the nearest planet where we could live comfortably... is being, like, from New York to Australia... what we've achieved so far, in going to the moon, that's about two-and-a-half inches. So that's the challenge.
Global warming is controversial, of course, but the controversy is mainly over whether human activity is driving it.
Better understanding of the natural world not only enhances all of us as human beings, but can also be harnessed for the better good, leading to improved health and quality of life.
We have such a terrible, terrible misconception of science. We think it involves the definite, the precise, the known; it is a horrid series of gates to an unknown as vast of the universe; which means endless.
We have a picture for how complexity arises, because if the universe is computationally capable, maybe we shouldn't be so surprised that things are so entirely out of control.
Even though I knew pretty early that I was going to be a scientist, it wasn't the science that interested me in science fiction; it was the vision of future societies that, for better or worse, would be radically different from our own.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.