Our chief defect is that we are more given to talking about things than to doing them.
Science and technology have freed humanity from many burdens and given us this new perspective and great power. This power can be used for the good of all. If wisdom governs our actions; but if the world is mad or foolish, it can destroy itself just when great advances and triumphs are almost without its grasp.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Advancements in science and technology provide great benefits, but they require wisdom to be used responsibly.
This quote by Jawaharlal Nehru highlights the duality of science and technology as powerful tools that can transform human life. While they have the potential to alleviate burdens and empower humanity, they also carry the risk of destruction if mismanaged or wielded without wisdom. Therefore, it emphasizes the importance of aligning our technological advancements with ethical guidance and wisdom to ensure they contribute positively to society rather than leading to chaos or disaster.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech on technological advancements, one could quote Nehru to emphasize the need for ethical innovation.
More from Jawaharlal Nehru
All quotes →India has known the innocence and insouciance of childhood, the passion and abandon of youth, and the ripe wisdom of maturity that comes from long experience of pain and pleasure; and over and over a gain she has renewed her childhood and youth and age
Life is like a game of cards. The hand you are dealt is determinism; the way you play it is free will.
Crises and deadlocks when they occur have at least this advantage, that they force us to think.
What we really are matters more than what other people think of us.
Loyal and efficient work in a great cause, even though it may not be immediately recognized, ultimately bears fruit.
Similar quotes
Crash programs fail because they are based on theory that, with nine women pregnant, you can get a baby in a month.
Cancer is not one disease but many diseases.
I was taught over and over again that the accumulation of random mutations led to evolutionary change - led to new species. I believed it until I looked for evidence.
Nearly all inventions are not recognised for their positive side either when they're made. So, for example, scientists didn't go out to design a CD machine: they designed a laser. But we got all sorts of things from a laser which we never remotely imagined, and we're still finding things for a laser to do.
I had a bet with Gordon Kane of Michigan University that the Higgs particle wouldn't be found.
My complaint is that there are more books and news articles than there are primary scientific papers. I am probably the biggest critic of the hypesters, because it's dangerous when fields get overhyped.