Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves.
Interpretation
Science helps us understand the truth and avoid self-deception.
Richard P. Feynman's quote highlights the essence of science as a discipline aimed at uncovering reality. Instead of being misled by our biases or misconceptions, science encourages a systematic approach to learning and understanding the world around us, enabling individuals to critically assess information and arrive at valid conclusions.
In practice
In a college lecture on critical thinking, this quote can be used to emphasize the importance of skepticism in scientific inquiry.
The philosophical question before us is, when we make an observation of our track in the past, does the result of our observation become real in the same sense that the final state would be defined if an outside observer were to make the observation?
We seem gradually to be groping toward an understanding of the world of subatomic particles, but we really do not know how far we have yet to go in this task.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.
It has not yet become obvious to me that there's no real problem. I cannot define the real problem; therefore, I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem.
For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined it. Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?
Science is a way to teach how something gets to be known, what is not known, to what extent things are known (for nothing is known absolutely), how to handle doubt and uncertainty, what the rules of evidence are, how to think about things so that judgments can be made, how to distinguish truth from fraud, and from show.
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
[T]here are depths of thousands of miles which are hidden from our inquiry. The only tidings we have from those unfathomable regions are by means of volcanoes, those burning mountains that seem to discharge their materials from the lowest abysses of the earth.
My study is NOT as a climatologist, but from a completely different perspective in_x000D_ which I am an expert β¦ For decades, as a professional experimental test engineer, I have analyzed experimental data and watched others massage and present data. I became a cynic; My conclusion - 'if someone is aggressively selling a technical product who's merits are dependent on complex experimental data, he is likely lying'. That is true whether the product is an airplane or a Carbon Credit.
Civilization as it is known today could not have evolved, nor can it survive, without an adequate food supply.
Even though NASA tries to simulate launch, and we practice in simulators, it's not the same - it's not even close to the same.
For me, science is already fantastical enough. Unlocking the secrets of nature with fundamental physics or cosmology or astrobiology leads you into a wonderland compared with which beliefs in things like alien abductions pale into insignificance.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.