If you think that the distance from the Earth to the nearest planet where we could live comfortably... is being, like, from New York to Australia... what we've achieved so far, in going to the moon, that's about two-and-a-half inches. So that's the challenge.
As a scientist, objectivity is one of my most deeply held values. If we could just try harder, I once thought, surely we could each see the world as others see it and learn to respect one another's views more readily. But I learned from the Pirahas, our expectations, our culture, and our experiences can render even perceptions of the environment nearly incommensurable cross-culturally.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Objectivity in science is vital, but cultural differences can make perceptions of reality vary significantly.
In this quote, Daniel Everett expresses the importance of objectivity in scientific exploration, highlighting the notion that while striving for understanding we often believe it’s possible to see the world from others' perspectives. However, he learned through his experiences with the Pirahã people that cultural backgrounds and personal experiences can create significant gaps in how individuals perceive their environments, leading to challenges in cross-cultural understanding and communication.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a presentation about cultural anthropology.
Similar quotes
Instead, in the absence of respect for human rights, science and its offspring technology have been used in this century as brutal instruments for oppression.
If we could look through the skull into the brain of a consciously thinking person, and if the place of optimal excitability were luminous, then we should see playing over the cerebral surface, a bright spot with fantastic, waving borders constantly fluctuating in size and form, surrounded by a darkness more or less deep, covering the rest of the hemisphere.
I don't think that science is complete at all. We don't understand everything, and one can see, within science itself, there are many inconsistencies. We just have to accept that we don't understand.
The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
We thus learn that man is descended from a hairy quadruped, furnished with a tail and pointed ears, probably arboreal in its habits, and an inhabitant of the Old World.