Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science.
There we measure shadows, and we search among ghostly errors of measurement for landmarks that are scarcely more substantial.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on the challenges of understanding the universe through measurement, hinting at the imperfections of human knowledge.
Edwin Powell Hubble's quote delves into the complexities of astronomical observations, emphasizing that as we attempt to quantify and understand the universe, we often rely on measurements that are imprecise and ephemeral. The shadows we measure symbolize the elusive nature of cosmic truths, while the 'ghostly errors' represent the uncertainties inherent in scientific inquiry. This statement conveys a profound sense of humility in the face of the vast unknown, highlighting both the significance and limitations of our quest for knowledge.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a talk about the challenges of scientific discovery, this quote can illustrate the importance of understanding measurement errors.
More from Edwin Powell Hubble
All quotes βAt the last dim horizon, we search among ghostly errors of observations for landmarks that are scarcely more substantial. The search will continue. The urge is older than history. It is not satisfied and it will not be oppressed.
The history of astronomy is a history of receding horizons.
Equipped with our five senses - along with telescopes and microscopes and mass spectrometers and seismographs and magnetometers and particle accelerators and detectors sensitive to the entire electromagnetic spectrum - we explore the universe around us and call the adventure science.
All nature is a vast symbolism: Every material fact has sheathed within it a spiritual truth.
Observations always involve theory.
Similar quotes
One of the pleasures of looking at the world through mathematical eyes is that you can see certain patterns that would otherwise be hidden.
Nearly all inventions are not recognised for their positive side either when they're made. So, for example, scientists didn't go out to design a CD machine: they designed a laser. But we got all sorts of things from a laser which we never remotely imagined, and we're still finding things for a laser to do.
What we want is scientists who don't become part of the policy discussion: All they do is produce science. If someone becomes an advocate, then I won't pay as much attention to their science.
If there's one operation for a disease, you know it works. If there are 15 operations, you know that none of them work.
There are many people talking about access to space and, 'How can we make that cheaper? How can we turn that into a Southwest Airlines versus the big airlines?'
I lose sleep at night wondering whether we are intelligent enough to figure out the universe. I don't know.