I've always argued that this country has benefited immensely from the fact that we draw people from all over the world.
Alan GreenspanRead
Significantly opening up immigration to skilled workers solves two problems. The companies could hire the educated workers they need. And those workers would compete with high-income people, driving more income equality.
Interpretation
Opening immigration for skilled workers benefits companies and promotes income equality.
This quote by Alan Greenspan highlights the dual advantages of significantly increasing immigration for skilled workers. Not only does it enable businesses to hire the educated labor they require to thrive, but it also creates a competitive environment where these skilled workers can negotiate for better wages, ultimately contributing to greater income equality across society.
In practice
During a conference on economic growth, one might use this quote to emphasize the importance of skilled immigration in fostering a robust economy.
I've always argued that this country has benefited immensely from the fact that we draw people from all over the world.
There's no other job in public life that is like chairman of the Fed.
Since 1948 I have spent every single day thinking how the economic and political worlds have changed.
Most high-income people in our country do not realize that their incomes are being subsidized by their protection from competition from highly skilled people who are prevented from immigrating to the United States. But we need such skills in order to staff our productive economy, so that the standard of living for Americans as a whole can grow.
I don't know where the stock market is going, but I will say this, that if it continues higher, this will do more to stimulate the economy than anything we've been talking about today or anything anybody else was talking about.
Every economy exists, no matter what the level of democracy, has elements of crony capitalism. It's - given human nature and given the democratic structures, which we all, I assume, adhere to, that is an inevitable consequence.
Drug companies spend more on advertising and marketing than on research, more on research on lifestyle drugs than on life saving drugs, and almost nothing on diseases that affect developing countries only. This is not surprising. Poor people cannot afford drugs, and drug companies make investments that yield the highest returns.
It is better that a man should tyrannize over his bank balance than over his fellow-citizens and whilst the former is sometimes denounced as being but a means to the latter, sometimes at least it is an alternative.
Landlords grow rich in their sleep without working, risking or economising
There's no reason to think that_x000D_ markets always drive people to_x000D_ what's good for them.
And you can't have a prosperous economy when the government is way overspending, raising tax rates, printing too much money, over regulating and restricting free trade. It just can't be done.
In financial terms, my sense is that the distribution of wealth, unequal as it is, is self-perpetuating, and, especially in a linked and accelerating world, the rich get ever more quickly richer while the poor get ever more speedily poorer.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.