If we look at the way the universe behaves, quantum mechanics gives us fundamental, unavoidable indeterminacy, so that alternative histories of the universe can be assigned probability.
Murray Gell-MannRead
Sometimes the probabilities are very close to certainties, but they're never really certainties
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes that while some outcomes may seem almost guaranteed, there is always an element of uncertainty involved.
Murray Gell-Mann's quote reminds us that in the realm of probabilities, there are instances where certain outcomes appear almost inevitable; however, it is crucial to acknowledge that absolute certainties do not exist in reality. This highlights the importance of understanding that even in situations where we feel confident, the unpredictable nature of life and science means we must remain open to the possibility of unexpected results.
In practice
In a scientific conference discussing theories and predictions.
If we look at the way the universe behaves, quantum mechanics gives us fundamental, unavoidable indeterminacy, so that alternative histories of the universe can be assigned probability.
Just because things get a little dingy at the subatomic level doesn't mean all bets are off.
If someone says that he can think or talk about quantum physics without becoming dizzy, that shows only that he has not understood anything whatever about it.
What is especially striking and remarkable is that in fundamental physics a beautiful or elegant theory is more likely to be right than a theory that is inelegant.
But when it has been shown by the researches of Pasteur that the septic property of the atmosphere depended not on the oxygen, or any gaseous constituent, but on minute organisms suspended in it, which owed their energy to their vitality, it occurred to me that decomposition in the injured part might be avoided without excluding the air, by applying as a dressing some material capable of destroying the life of the floating particles. Upon this principle I have based a practice.
If the only time you think of me as a scientist is during Black History Month, then I must not be doing my job as a scientist.
From the described experiment it is clear that the mere act of eating, the food even not reaching the stomach, determines the stimulation of the gastric glands.
Economics is in many respects the queen of the soft sciences. It's expected to be better than the rest. It's my view that economics is better at the multi-disciplinary stuff than the rest of the soft science. And it's also my view that it's still lousy.
Mystics exult in mystery and want it to stay mysterious. Scientists exult in mystery for a different reason: It gives them something to do.
With any hallucinations, if you can do functional brain imagery while they're going on, you will find that the parts of the brain usually involved in seeing or hearing - in perception - have become super active by themselves. And this is an autonomous activity; this does not happen with imagination.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.