It has always seemed to me that so long as you produce your dramatic effect, accuracy of detail matters little. I have never striven for it and I have made some bad mistakes in consequence. What matter if I hold my readers?
Arthur Conan DoyleRead
Still, it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories.
Interpretation
This quote highlights the pitfalls of letting personal biases skew the interpretation of data.
Arthur Conan Doyle's quote emphasizes the importance of objectivity when analyzing data. It suggests that when faced with information that contradicts our beliefs or theories, we may unconsciously manipulate the data to support our preconceived notions, rather than allowing the evidence to guide our understanding. This serves as a caution against confirmation bias in both scientific research and everyday reasoning.
In practice
In a presentation about data analysis, one might quote this to stress the importance of remaining impartial.
It has always seemed to me that so long as you produce your dramatic effect, accuracy of detail matters little. I have never striven for it and I have made some bad mistakes in consequence. What matter if I hold my readers?
I had neither kith nor kin in England, and was therefore as free as air -- or as free as an income of eleven shillings and sixpence a day will permit a man to be. Under such circumstances, I naturally gravitated to London, that great cesspool into which all the loungers and idlers of the Empire are irresistibly drained.
A dog reflects the family life. Whoever saw a frisky dog in a gloomy family, or a sad dog in a happy one? Snarling people have snarling dogs, dangerous people have dangerous ones.
You yourself may not be luminous, but you are a conductor of light.
I could not rest, Watson, I could not sit quiet in my chair, if I thought that such a man as Professor Moriarty were walking the streets of London unchallenged.
It seems very strange ... that in the course of the world's history so obvious an improvement should never have been adopted. ... The next generation of Britishers would be the better for having had this extra hour of daylight in their childhood.
Almost everything that distinguishes the modern world from earlier centuries is attributable to science, which achieved its most spectacular triumphs in the seventeenth century.
Science, at bottom, is really anti-intellectual. It always distrusts pure reason, and demands the production of objective fact.
Since we proposed punctuated equilibria to explain trends, it is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists-whether through design or stupidity, I do not know-as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.
The aim of scientific thought, then, is to apply past experience to new circumstances; the instrument is an observed uniformity in the course of events. By the use of this instrument it gives us information transcending our experience, it enables us to infer things that we have not seen from things that we have seen; and the evidence for the truth of that information depends on our supposing that the uniformity holds good beyond our experience.
Science - or the products of science like technology - is just a way of achieving something real, something that happens, something that works.
One day the world will look upon research upon animals as it now looks upon research on human beings.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.