The Tao which you know is not the eternal Tao
Interpretation
This quote suggests that human understanding is limited and cannot fully grasp the true essence of existence.
Laozi, a foundational figure in Taoist philosophy, emphasizes that the concepts and ideas we hold about the Tao (or 'the Way') are merely interpretations and do not capture its eternal and true nature. It reminds us that language and human perception are inadequate to encompass the full depth of reality and encourages a sense of humility towards the limits of our knowledge.
In practice
In a philosophy class discussing the limits of human knowledge.
If you understand others you are smart._x000D_ If you understand yourself you are illuminated._x000D_ If you overcome others you are powerful._x000D_ If you overcome yourself you have strength._x000D_ If you know how to be satisfied you are rich._x000D_ If you can act with vigor, you have a will._x000D_ If you don't lose your objectives you can be long-lasting._x000D_ If you die without loss, you are eternal.
When nothing is done, nothing is left undone.
A good traveler has no fixed plans, and is not intent on arriving.
Knowing others is wisdom, knowing yourself is enlightenment.
In the world there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong nothing can surpass it.
Rule your mind with serenity rather than with force and manipulation.
God is not present in idols. Your feelings are your god. The soul is your temple.
The real differences around the world today are not between Jews and Arabs; Protestants and Catholics; Muslims, Croats, and Serbs. The real differences are between those who embrace peace and those who would destroy it. Between those who look to the future and those who cling to the past. Between those who open their arms and those who are determined to clench their fists.
Your joy can fill you only as deeply as your sorrow has carved you.
When fanatics are on top there is no limit to oppression.
How long had he been doing what was necessary instead of what was right? In a fair world they would be one and the same.
People have been predicting the death of philosophy since the 17th century. When I was a student, people were saying, 'We're in the last days of philosophy.' Then we were told in the '60s it would be replaced by sociology, then by literary criticism.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.