As we segregate by income into different communities, schools in lower-income areas have fewer resources than ever.
Robert ReichRead
Tax laws favor capital over labor, giving capital gains a lower rate than ordinary income. The rich get humongous mortgage interest deductions while renters get no deduction at all.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the disparity in tax benefits between capital gains and ordinary income, favoring the wealthy.
Robert Reich points out the inequities in tax laws that benefit capital over labor, emphasizing how the wealthy receive significant advantages, such as lower tax rates on capital gains and mortgage interest deductions, while those who rely on wages and renters do not enjoy similar benefits. This systemic bias raises questions about fairness in the taxation system and the impact on economic inequality.
In practice
During a discussion on tax reform, one might use this quote to illustrate the need for more equitable policies.
As we segregate by income into different communities, schools in lower-income areas have fewer resources than ever.
What are called 'public schools' in many of America's wealthy communities aren't really 'public' at all. In effect, they're private schools, whose tuition is hidden away in the purchase price of upscale homes there, and in the corresponding property taxes.
What someone is paid has little or no relationship to what their work is worth to society.
The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant. ... America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve, and America's foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund [IMF]. ...when the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress.
You can't inspire people if you are going to be uninspiring.
Media outlets that are exploiting Ebola because they want a sensational story and politicians using it to their own ends ought to be ashamed.
China adopted a capitalist system in the 1980s, and they went from a 60% poverty rate to 10%.
Credit is a promise to deliver money. It will produce GDP but you'll create credit... So you reach a certain point that that you can't do that anymore... There are choices. And how do we best support, apportion the money? How much is going to be transferred?
I've never believed protectionism of that kind will lead us anywhere. I think you can have certain specific rules for engaging with India.. for example, not allowing mineral resources to be taken out of the country.. but there is not a shred of doubt in my mind that when you open an economy you should do it in totality. Foreign investment adds a sense of competition; we should see this as a wake-up call to modernise and upgrade. Companies that do not will undoubtedly die.
Inflation is not caused by the actions of private citizens, but by the government: by an artificial expansion of the money supply required to support deficit spending. No private embezzlers or bank robbers in history have ever plundered people's savings on a scale comparable to the plunder perpetrated by the fiscal policies of statist governments.
Why does a public discussion of economic policy so often show the abysmal ignorance of the participants?
I am a huge bull on this country. We will not have a double-dip recession at all. I see our businesses coming back almost across the board.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.