More and more we are into communications; and less and less into communication.
Studs TerkelRead
Having been blacklisted from working in television during the McCarthy era, I know the harm of government using private corporations to intrude into the lives of innocent Americans. When government uses the telephone companies to create massive databases of all our phone calls it has gone too far.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the dangers of government overreach through collaboration with private companies, particularly in monitoring citizens.
Studs Terkel reflects on the chilling effects of government surveillance and the historical context of the McCarthy era, where individuals were persecuted and privacy was compromised. He warns against the alarming trend of using corporate resources for state surveillance, suggesting that such actions infringe on personal freedoms and threaten the integrity of democracy.
In practice
In a discussion about privacy rights, this quote can emphasize the risks of government surveillance.
More and more we are into communications; and less and less into communication.
When it comes to the news, the corporate view is `objective,' all else is propaganda.
Think of what's stored in an 80- or a 90-year-old mind. Just marvel at it. You've got to get out this information, this knowledge, because you've got something to pass on. There'll be nobody like you ever again. Make the most of every molecule you've got as long as you've got a second to go.
Heroes are not giant statues framed against a red sky. They are people who say: This is my community, and it is my responsibility to make it better. Interweave all these communities and you really have an America that is back on its feet again. I really think we are gonna have to reassess what constitutes a 'hero'.
We are the most powerful nation in the world, but we're not the only nation in the world. We are not the only people in the world. We are an important people, the wealthiest, the most powerful and, to a great extent, generous. But we are part of the world.
I read somewhere that when a person takes part in community action, his health improves. Something happens to him or to her biologically. It's like a tonic.
In 1988, when democracy was restored, the military establishment was still very powerful. The extremist groups were still there. And when the aid and assistance to Pakistan was cut, we had to adopt harsh economic policies. So in a way, it showed that democracy doesn't pay, and the military was able to reassert itself.
The problem with party politics is that people get involved every two or four years and that is it. In the meantime, the legislature and Minnesota politics are on a separate track.
Polling is merely an instrument for gauging public opinion. When a president or any other leader pays attention to poll results, he is, in effect, paying attention to the views of the people. Any other interpretation is nonsense.
The blunt truth about the politics of climate change is that no country will want to sacrifice its economy in order to meet this challenge.
Our ability to participate in government, to elect our leaders and to improve our lives is contingent upon our ability to access the ballot. We know in our heart of hearts that voting is a sacred right - the fount from which all other rights flow.
Jealousy, and local policy mix too much in all our public councils for the good government of the Union. In a words, the confederation appears to me to be little more than a shadow without the substance . . . .
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.