What does it mean, exactly, for a given system to be a 'neural correlate of consciousness'?
David ChalmersRead
There's certainly nothing original about the observation that conscious experience poses a hard problem.
Interpretation
Conscious experience is complex and difficult to fully understand.
David Chalmers expresses the idea that while many have noted the intricate nature of conscious experience, it remains a challenging topic in philosophy and science. This 'hard problem' of consciousness refers to the difficulty in explaining why and how subjective experiences arise from physical processes in the brain, highlighting the gaps in our understanding of the mind-body relationship.
In practice
In a philosophy class discussing the nature of consciousness.
What does it mean, exactly, for a given system to be a 'neural correlate of consciousness'?
Within psychology and neuroscience, some new and rigorous experimental paradigms for studying consciousness have helped it begin to overcome the stigma that has been attached to the topic for most of this century.
I think that consciousness has always been the most important topic in the philosophy of mind, and one of the most important topics in cognitive science as a whole, but it had been surprisingly neglected in recent years.
In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.
It was a Greek tragedy. Nixon was fulfilling his own nature. Once it started it could not end otherwise.
Animals are my friends... and I don't eat my friends.
Of this stamp is the cant of, Not men, but measures.
The search for scapegoats is essentially an abnegation of responsibility: it indicates an inability to assess honestly and intelligently the true nature of the problems which lie at the root of social and economic difficulties and a lack of resolve in grappling with them.
We who are atheists are also a-fairyists, a-teapotists, and a-unicornists, but we don't have to bother saying so.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.