If a victory is told in detail, one can no longer distinguish it from a defeat.
If you begin by saying, 'Thou shalt not lie,' there is no longer any possibility of political action.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Sartre suggests that strict moral principles can hinder practical and necessary actions in politics.
In this quote, Jean-Paul Sartre expresses the idea that rigid moral codes, such as a prohibition against lying, can obstruct the effectiveness of political action. He implies that political decisions often require flexibility and pragmatism, and that an absolute stance against certain actions may limit one's ability to navigate complex situations. This reflects Sartre's existentialist views on ethics, emphasizing that context and intention can sometimes outweigh absolute moral dictates.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on ethics in leadership, one might cite this quote to showcase the complexities of moral decision-making in political contexts.
More from Jean-Paul Sartre
All quotes βAll I want is' - and he uttered the final words through clenched teeth and with a sort of shame - 'to retain my freedom.' I should myself have thought,' said Jacques, 'that freedom consisted in frankly confronting situations into which one had deliberately entered, and accepting all one's responsibilities. But that, no doubt, is not your view.
If you are lonely when you're alone, you are in bad company.
A kiss without a moustache, they said then, is like an egg without salt; I will add to it: and it is like Good without Evil.
I wanted pure love: foolishness; to love one another is to hate a common enemy: I will thus espouse your hatred. I wanted Good: nonsense; on this earth and in these times, Good and Bad are inseparable: I accept to be evil in order to become good.
Night is falling: at dusk, you must have good eyesight to be able to tell the Good Lord from the Devil.
Similar quotes
If every small nation with a border dispute believes they can go ahead and launch a pre-emptive war and that it will be approved by the greatest power, that is a very dangerous thing.
Life is the art of being well deceived; and in order that the deception may succeed it must be habitual and uninterrupted.
I do not consider it an insult, but rather a compliment to be called an agnostic. I do not pretend to know where many ignorant men are sure - that is all that agnosticism means.
Multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.
In reality, killing time is only the name for another of the multifarious ways by which Time kills us.
Has not the experience of two centuries shown that gradualism in theory is perpetuity in practice? Is there an instance, in the history of the world, where slaves have been educated for freedom by their task-masters?