Sooner or later, false thinking brings wrong conduct.
Julian HuxleyRead
Today the god hypothesis has ceased to be scientifically tenable, has lost its explanatory value and is becoming an intellectual and moral burden to our thought. It no longer convinces or comforts, and its abandonment often brings a deep sense of relief.
Interpretation
The belief in a god is no longer scientifically credible and is seen as a burden on our understanding.
Julian Huxley's quote reflects a perspective that the traditional concept of a god has become outdated in the light of scientific progress. He argues that this belief no longer provides meaningful explanations or solace for human existence and that many find liberation in moving away from such hypotheses, suggesting a shift towards secular thinking and reliance on rationality and evidence.
In practice
In a discussion about the intersection of science and religion, this quote can be used to highlight how some view the decline of the god hypothesis.
Sooner or later, false thinking brings wrong conduct.
...any belief in supernatural creators, rulers, or influencers of natural or human process introduces an irreparable split into the universe, and prevents us from grasping its real unity. Any belief in Absolutes, whether the absolute validity of moral commandments, of authority of revelation, of inner certitudes, or of divine inspiration, erects a formidable barrier against progress and the responsibility of improvement, moral, rational, and religious.
To speculate without facts is to attempt to enter a house of which one has not the key, by wandering aimlessly round and round, searching the walls and now and then peeping through the windows. Facts are the key.
Will our Philosophy to later Life_x000D_ _x000D_ Seem but a crudeness of the planet's youth,_x000D_ _x000D_ Our Wisdom but a parasite of Truth?
The scientific doctrine of progress is destined to replace not only the myth of progress, but all other myths of human earthly destiny. It will inevitably become one of the cornerstones of man's theology, or whatever may be the future substitute for theology, and the most important external support for human ethics.
The biographer's problem is that he never knows enough. The autobiographer's problem is that he knows too much.
We all have some experience of a feeling, that comes over us occasionally, of what we are saying and doing having been said and done before, in a remote time - of our having been surrounded, dim ages ago, by the same faces, objects, and circumstances.
Everyone has a story; everyone hides his past as a means of self-preservation. Some just do it better, and more thoroughly, than others.
As for oblivion, well, we can wait a little while for that.
Whenever I happen to be in a city of any size, I marvel that riots do not break out everyday: Massacres, unspeakable carnage, a doomsday chaos. How can so many human beings coexist in a space so confined without hating each other to death?
A well-instructed people alone can be permanently a free people.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.