I must confess it was very unexpected and I am very startled at my metamorphosis into a chemist.
Ernest RutherfordRead
We have to understand the ubiquity of energy in everything we do. Energy is core to our economy and it brings with it environmental challenges, and it's core to our security challenges.
Interpretation
Energy is fundamental to all aspects of life, economy, and security, but it also poses environmental challenges.
Ernest Moniz emphasizes the importance of energy in our daily lives and its critical role in shaping our economy and security. He points out that while energy is essential for progress and security, it also comes with significant environmental challenges that must be addressed, highlighting the dual nature of energy's impact on society.
In practice
In a speech about renewable energy initiatives.
I must confess it was very unexpected and I am very startled at my metamorphosis into a chemist.
There are grounds for cautious optimism that we may now be near the end ofthe search for the ultimate laws of nature.
If we use our fuel to get our power, we are living on our capital and exhausting it rapidly. This method is barbarous and wantonly wasteful, and will have to be stopped in the interest of coming generations. The heat of the sun's rays represents an immense amount of energy vastly in excess of waterpower...The sun's energy controlled to create lakes and rivers for motive purposes and transformation of arid deserts into fertile land.
Right now, there could well be messages from the stars flying right through this room. Through you and me. And if we had the right receiver set up properly, we could detect them. I still get chills thinking about it.
There's a misconception that survival of the fittest means survival of the most aggressive. The adjective 'Darwinian' used to refer to ruthless competition; you used to read that in business journals. But that's not what Darwinian means to a biologist; it's whatever leads to reproductive success.
Science has a culture that is inherently cautious and that is normally not a bad thing. You could even say conservative, because of the peer review process and because the scientific method prizes uncertainty and penalises anyone who goes out on any sort of a limb that is not held in place by abundant and well-documented evidence.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.