Compromise, while at times morally necessary or at least justifiable, is more often only the first permission for a person (or society) to begin a long downhill descent.
Dennis PragerRead
Unhappy, let alone angry, religious people provide more persuasive arguments for atheism and secularism than do all the arguments of atheists.
Interpretation
Unhappy or angry religious people can inadvertently strengthen the case for atheism.
This quote suggests that the visible discontent of religious individuals, particularly when they express anger or unhappiness, can serve as a more powerful argument against theistic beliefs than the rational arguments posed by atheists. The implication is that the emotional state of the religious can shape perceptions and provoke questioning about faith in a way that logical discourse may not.
In practice
In a discussion about faith and belief systems, one might use this quote to illustrate the pitfalls of religious dissatisfaction.
Compromise, while at times morally necessary or at least justifiable, is more often only the first permission for a person (or society) to begin a long downhill descent.
If _x000D_ we continue to teach about tolerance and intolerance _x000D_ instead _x000D_ of good and evil, we will end up with tolerance of _x000D_ evil.
Compassion without wisdom is dangerous. It's what enables people to support the 'underdog,' even if the underdog is evil
If you equate happiness with success, you will never achieve the amount of success necessary to make you happy.
To posit the existence of a Creator requires only reason. To posit the existence of a good God requires faith.
Whatever one does for a living, three questions need to be confronted before it is too late: What really matters to me? What price do my spouse and kids pay for my career success? What price does my soul pay?
I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I am afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare.
If you want guarantees in life, then you don't want life. You want rehearsals for a script that's already been written. Life by its nature cannot have guarantees, or its whole purpose is thwarted.
My name is Stephen Leeds, and I am perfectly sane. My hallucinations, however, are all quite mad.
It could be ventured to understand obsessive compulsive neurosis as the pathological counterpart of religious development, to define neurosis as an individual religiosity; to define religion as a universal obsessive compulsive neurosis.
Little more can reasonably be aimed at with respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed.
It is still fashionable to believe that how you organize yourself religiously in this life may matter for eternity. Unless we can erode the prestige of that kind of thinking, we're not going to be able to undermine these divisions in our world.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.