When a human being kills an animal for food, he is neglecting his own hunger for justice.
Isaac Bashevis SingerRead
To be a vegetarian is to disagree - to disagree with the course of things today... starvation, cruelty - we must make a statement against these things. Vegetarianism is my statement. And I think it's a strong one.
Interpretation
Being a vegetarian is a conscious choice that challenges societal norms of cruelty and starvation.
This quote by Isaac Bashevis Singer suggests that choosing vegetarianism is not merely a diet, but a moral and philosophical stance against societal issues such as cruelty towards animals and hunger in the world. It emphasizes that such a choice serves as a powerful statement reflecting an individual's values and beliefs about compassion and ethical consumption.
In practice
In a speech advocating for animal rights, one might use this quote to emphasize the moral imperative behind vegetarianism.
When a human being kills an animal for food, he is neglecting his own hunger for justice.
There will be no justice as long as man will stand with a knife or with a gun and destroy those who are weaker than he is.
Our knowledge is a little island in a great ocean of nonknowledge.
As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
Sometimes love is stronger than a man's convictions.
I did not become a vegetarian for my health, I did it for the health of the chickens.
If our 'message' is anything, it's a positive approach to life. That life is basically good. People are basically good.
Your life is the fruit of your own doing. You have no one to blame but yourself.
Where to begin? Do we measure the relaxing of the feet? The moment when the eye glimpses the hawk, when instinct functions? For in this pure action, this pure moving of the bird, there is no time, no space, but only the free doing-being of this very moment -now!
It turns out that globalisation, while promising sameness through brand-name consumption, was fostering, through uneven economic growth, an intense feeling of difference.
You are the plays you write. How on earth could you write them otherwise? They're projections of your own predilections.
For twenty-five centuries, Western knowledge has tried to look upon the world. It has failed to understand that the world is not for the beholding. It is for hearing. It is not legible, but audible.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.