[E]very act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.
If you say that you reject violence when it exceeds the limits imposed by the needs of defense, they accuse you of pacifism, without understanding that violence is the whole essence of authoritarianism, just as the repudiation of violence is the whole essence of anarchism.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the dichotomy between violence as a means of authoritarian control and the rejection of violence as a fundamental principle of anarchism.
Errico Malatesta's quote addresses the complex relationship between violence and authority, arguing that authoritarianism inherently relies on violence, while anarchism fundamentally seeks to reject it. He points out that the condemnation of violence, particularly beyond self-defense, is often labeled as pacifism, which fails to grasp the deeper philosophical opposition between coercive power and voluntary cooperation in society.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on social justice, one could use this quote to illustrate the complexities of protest movements.
Similar quotes
Not keep a journal! How are your absent cousins to understand the tenor of your life in Bath without one? How are the civilities and compliments of every day to be related as they ought to be, unless noted down every evening in a journal? How are your various dresses to be remembered, and the particular state of your complexion, and curl of your hair to be described in all their diversities, without having constant recourse to a journal?
Liberty for each, for all, and forever!
At least I know I'm bewildered about the really fundamental and important facts of the universe.
Neurosis is the result of a conflict between the ego and its id, whereas psychosis is the analogous outcome of a similar disturbance in the relation between the ego and the external world.
What was taken by force, can only be restored by force.