In a healthy, normal society, people can disagree with one another, even have diametrically opposing views, and this does not at all mean that they must hate one another. The Polish authorities, however, have made the division of Poles their primary task.
If you say that you reject violence when it exceeds the limits imposed by the needs of defense, they accuse you of pacifism, without understanding that violence is the whole essence of authoritarianism, just as the repudiation of violence is the whole essence of anarchism.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the dichotomy between violence as a means of authoritarian control and the rejection of violence as a fundamental principle of anarchism.
Errico Malatesta's quote addresses the complex relationship between violence and authority, arguing that authoritarianism inherently relies on violence, while anarchism fundamentally seeks to reject it. He points out that the condemnation of violence, particularly beyond self-defense, is often labeled as pacifism, which fails to grasp the deeper philosophical opposition between coercive power and voluntary cooperation in society.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on social justice, one could use this quote to illustrate the complexities of protest movements.
Similar quotes
Christ's own 'God-forsaken-ness' on the cross showed me where God is present where God had been present in those nights of deaths in the fire storms in Hamburg and where God would be present in my future whatever may come.
Authority, power, and wealth do not change a man; they only reveal him
An animal that embarks on forming states without greatly restricting egoism will perish.
Once you get to the Enlightenment, the way that powers get to be hyperpowers isn't just by conquest. It's through commerce and innovation. Societies like the Dutch Republic and the United States used tolerance to become a magnet for enterprising immigrants.
We chart delusions through collective agreement.